also, i feel 2012 is a good place to "cap" it so to say, since it is the last year that i remember having VRs as part of regular releases (august pps and july lioness specifically).
Sinbreaker wrote:nickjr wrote:I'm not sure I'm comfortable voting in the poll, because if this is going to be a rarity-based list, then I'd much rather have a cutoff for rarity changes rather than pet adoption date, if that makes sense? (and then have notes for pets released after the cutoff that started out as VR since we have no idea where in the VR range they are)
For the pet count project, lil rascal made a list here of all non-List pets that turned VR pretty early, which we are including in our list for the pet counter to count. I feel kinda bad linking it but the pet count project and this rarity-based List idea do overlap a lot and so I think some resources can be shared.
Of course, mentioned earlier we should consider pets throughout all the years especially if they have been VR for a long time.
But a majority of the pets should come from a certain year date like the rare's list for a good starting point, and then worked on as a community to narrow the trading guide, don't you agree?
IlluminatiConfirmed wrote:A few posts back I saw someone asking about the URs and I think the best would be to vote about it too! Maybe something along the lines of 'would you like the URs included in this list or have them on a separate list, or both'?
I might change my vote to 2008-2012 too (originally 2008-2010 I think) too for the reasons that have been discussed recently ^^ but I'm still considering it.
And of course to add or at least review and consider some odd balls pets like the vr space rat.
By the way, how long is the current poll going to last? A week or so?
Sinbreaker wrote:@Nickjr
Those pets in that situation will be addressed when we get there. One step at a time! If we find out that method of choosing pets is flawed, then we can start over. We're moving surprisingly quickly (which goes to show that there is some frustration with The Rare's List Guide) and I'm 100% certain we will find flaws with every method we go through, but as long as a majority of the community likes the outcome of a method of organization, then we should be fine.
nikkolah wrote:I think it'd be a good idea, following this poll, to have another poll seeing what people think about URs. Should they have their own list? Should they be higher or lower based on their release date, things like that.
nikkolah wrote:I think it'd be a good idea, following this poll, to have another poll seeing what people think about URs. Should they have their own list? Should they be higher or lower based on their release date, things like that.
Users browsing this forum: Abyss, Mortveil, Riley and 3 guests