
Icyblueblaze wrote:gathering; wrote:gathering; wrote:i'm not too sure of the worth of the ur pineapple,
so i wanted to see if this trade is fair. and this one!
thank you in advance!
Unsure about the first of the trades but for the second one it's very unfair to you. The pineapple is an above gap main list while the sorbet is a bit below the gap
live.a.little wrote:gathering; wrote:gathering; wrote:i'm not too sure of the worth of the ur pineapple,
so i wanted to see if this trade is fair. and this one!
thank you in advance!both are unfair to you by quite a bit. the pineapple i’ve seen actually has decent demand, but even without that it sits above the gap. the sorbet is better than the other trade, but still the sorbet is a below gap mainlist pet so they would need to add.

patriciaツ wrote:live.a.little wrote:-snip-
i traded up to a blue sorbet a couple weeks ago with a blue sorbert and a tier 5 advent. the toxic’s demand is not as good as the sorberts however they’re not difficult to trade in my experience. it really depends on how you value the demand, rarity wise a sorbert is 83-84 ma, a blue toxic valued at 94 ma so they are overpaying.

Canary22 wrote:adore you wrote:?
Unfair to them, your egg will grow to be a 2015 rare and their 2010 rare alone is overpay.Inkeyu wrote:Hello everyone. Just asking, is this a fair trade? https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78199342&userid=151228&signature=ypXokFXMK3ps41Xt9njWGA
Unfair to you due to the age gap.
~ So many adoptable creatures! ~ 





Kim Minseok wrote:Would This be a Fair trade?
Kim Minseok wrote:Would This be a Fair trade?
Users browsing this forum: Cryptweasel and 6 guests