The "Is this a fair trade?" thread

[dragongoddest]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455044&userid=179084&signature=3fslbEIjFAv2jUdGApY86Q

Can i get some opinions on this bid? Im not 100% sure what raven go for at the moment

It’s very unfair to you.
The general, average accepted value for the raven is still at a non, though that isn’t what it’s worth.
If you value you it as a non, and add in the value of the non jewel, their side is equal to two nons. Yes, there are other pets on their side. However, when dealing with pets of this magnitude, they don’t add that much. The other pets and items only add about another September list pet.
Going by rarity, the sunjewel is worth 5 nons.
Their side has two, if you value the raven at a non, and a September list. This isn’t even close to the value of the sunjewel

-kee

Ok. I knew it was unfair cause i vaule the sunjewel at 5 none but I honestly didn’t know if ravens went for nons so thank you.

[kee;]

Bid 4
Bid 5
Bid 6

How are these item bids for my sept list?

All of them are unfair to you.
Bids one and two are about equal in value of about 13-15 09 rares.
Bid three is more unfair to you at about 4 09 rares.

-kee

[st♥rshopping]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455685&userid=608338&signature=D4aIn47n_EbvhjxIEkV6TA
fair ?

[nobxdy]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455685&userid=608338&signature=D4aIn47n_EbvhjxIEkV6TA
fair ?

It's unfair to the Pink Mini Husky. The Pink Mini Husky is worth 4-5 '09 rares, your side is worth a little more than 3 '09 rares. (:

[sumatra.]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455516&userid=919435&signature=4mwit1doq4P_fuZQWNJo7g

I could be biased but is this undiar to me? I’m not so good at quantity

Since they have 6 2010 uncommons that would be equal to an 09 rare. A 2016 store pet is worth an early 2010 rare, though.
I'd make it so there's 4 2010 uncommons.

I’m confused how you’re doing your math. I usually value/see people valuing 2 uncommons at a rare of the release year. In that case the other side is overpaying by quite a bit.
2 of the 2010 uncommons would add up to the store pet, where as another 2010 uncommon would equal the cat. Everything else is severe overpay on their side

[Arcaii]

Is this trade fair to both of us? I've never really dealt with such high rarities and C$.

[sæter]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455516&userid=919435&signature=4mwit1doq4P_fuZQWNJo7g

I could be biased but is this undiar to me? I’m not so good at quantity

Since they have 6 2010 uncommons that would be equal to an 09 rare. A 2016 store pet is worth an early 2010 rare, though.
I'd make it so there's 4 2010 uncommons.

I’m confused how you’re doing your math. I usually value/see people valuing 2 uncommons at a rare of the release year. In that case the other side is overpaying by quite a bit.
2 of the 2010 uncommons would add up to the store pet, where as another 2010 uncommon would equal the cat. Everything else is severe overpay on their side

people value things differently, but the general ratio for rarity math and the one i use is 4 uncommons = a rare of the same year. a rare (4 uncommons) of one year = 2 rares (8 uncommons) of the next year or 2 uncommons of the previous/older year.

since they already have an '09 uncommon on their side, the 6 2010 rares are equal to 3 2009 uncommons for a total of 4. this is equivalent to an '09 rare, which is technically already overpay for the '15 store pet depending on how they value it.

the rest adds up to about a 2012 rare (2014-2017 pets), perhaps a bit under, which is equivalent to a 2010 uncommon to the warrior cat rarity-wise. the trade is about fair strictly rarity-wise.

however, others may use different ratios or value their pets differently, in which case it may be unfair. some also may not be willing to trade their rares/vrs/store pets down to uncommons/commons/later rares, but that's entirely up to them.

[SourSoup]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=73455516&userid=919435&signature=4mwit1doq4P_fuZQWNJo7g

I could be biased but is this undiar to me? I’m not so good at quantity

Since they have 6 2010 uncommons that would be equal to an 09 rare. A 2016 store pet is worth an early 2010 rare, though.
I'd make it so there's 4 2010 uncommons.

I’m confused how you’re doing your math. I usually value/see people valuing 2 uncommons at a rare of the release year. In that case the other side is overpaying by quite a bit.
2 of the 2010 uncommons would add up to the store pet, where as another 2010 uncommon would equal the cat. Everything else is severe overpay on their side

Valuing rares at 3/4 uncommons is how I did my math. I should've stated ^^ As it gets older in the years I value rares at 3/4 uncommons whereas earlier rares I value at 2.

[loppy555]

What do you think?

trades/viewtrade.php?id=73457342&userid=712675&signature=m9QkNBDmks5SiJ-ddi0daw

[snuppy]

OwO *notices your thread* is this a fair trade?
???