The "Is this a fair trade?" thread

[EchothroughDarkness]

Is this trade fair??

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73145092&userid=410864&signature=HwcxP8cCLQ0EpH3Kr7roUA

[Jaax]

Would you personally accept this?
Just based on demand, needing opinions, no need to calculate fairness. (I love my true-date 7th tiers, but I also love the PPS Dragon Cats, so this is a tough choice).

Personally I wouldn't accept, if the PPS dragon cat traded for tier 7s, they would have set it offering the cats alone, at least that'd be my thinking if I got the trade. The two tier 2 wood dogs are worth 3-4 rares each and so are worth one of the tier 7s. If you're particularly attached to your dogs, perhaps half the pets on both side? 2 of your dogs for 1 of their dark wood dogs and 2 dragon cats?

Thanks, second opinions? ^^
(I could try editing in two more wood dogs to their side, but I'm afraid it might seem to be too much?)

So instead of adding to their side, I'd suggest taking away one dog off of yours!
two of the pets on their side is equal to one of yours so they are, in total, offering a worth of 3 tier 7 dogs.

[Ecko]

Need advice please. This trade was cancelled as the member thought it was unfair to them. Was this fair? I use the rarity math of 1 R = 2 UC = 4 C's. Also, counted the rarity for the unknowns as UC's. Thank you in advance.

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73143187&userid=290953&signature=7bwrKDKqpFbAStq9kZSs-g

Most of their pets are pretty recent so I would say it would have been unfair to you. Now i did not sit and tally up all the pets, but a 2010 rare is worth 128 - 2017 rares for reference. Even if it was overpay on your side, you were trading for a large quantity of pets for only a few in return and that in itself can seem unfair to some people. Especially if they don't have a lot of pets to begin with.

[Dysautonomia]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=73147397&userid=730598&signature=Qi0v1cJuvb6cykxeRETN5A
Is this fair?

Your side = 12 mid-advents worth.
Their side = 12 mid-advents + 1 low-advent worth (cake dog is 6 ma, purple bat dog is 6 ma + la).
So, slight overpay on part of the top. ^^

Thank you

[RED-Legacy]

Need advice please. This trade was cancelled as the member thought it was unfair to them. Was this fair? I use the rarity math of 1 R = 2 UC = 4 C's. Also, counted the rarity for the unknowns as UC's. Thank you in advance.

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=73143187&userid=290953&signature=7bwrKDKqpFbAStq9kZSs-g

Most of their pets are pretty recent so I would say it would have been unfair to you. Now i did not sit and tally up all the pets, but a 2010 rare is worth 128 - 2017 rares for reference. Even if it was overpay on your side, you were trading for a large quantity of pets for only a few in return and that in itself can seem unfair to some people. Especially if they don't have a lot of pets to begin with.

Thank you Echo-Doodle

[Dancing.cinnamon~]

I'm thinking a yes?

Demand wise, how fair is this?
Boop

[serik]

Is this fair? Thanks for any help ^^

[dear.chaton]

i know the c$ is the correct amount for the sorbet,
but how do the pets add to this trade, does it make it
better or is it not fair to me?

[serik]

Is this fair? Thanks for any help ^^

[Zombilon]

i know the c$ is the correct amount for the sorbet,
but how do the pets add to this trade, does it make it
better or is it not fair to me?

The C$ alone is fair, the pets added aren't needed. Some users don't like trading their lists for C$, but this is very unfair to you. I would not accept.