appology wrote:Lot's of dog food brands are imperfect. Whatever brand you use probably has a bad source, faulty branding or a history of injuries or even casualties as a result of the food being consumed. Royal Canin, just like other brands, does a range of food and some, I admit, are better than others. Additionally, grains are not the only thing that dogs can be allergic too. Dogs can actually develop an allergy to food that they have been eating for years and some of the most common cases are: beef, dairy, wheat, egg, chicken, lamb, soy, pork, rabbit, and fish. They end up doing a variety of things (which is so common because almost every dog has an allergy to at least one of these things) such as chronic ear inflammation, gastrointestinal problems, and chronic diarrhea to chronic gas, licking their feet, or an itchy rear end.
- Oh, I know that. But I've certainly heard of more grain allergies than anything else. The most common protein allergy in chicken, and that can be avoided by feeding other food. Allergies can also be avoided by rotating proteins and similar brands.`
Halogen has a good point. Kibble is essentially the same as fast food, especially the cheaper brands such as Pedigree and Purina (in the UK) or Kibble n' Bits and Gravy Train in the US. When we know that fresh food is better, why do vets (who, aren't nutritionists, and do a single module taught by the companies who own cheaper brands - Nestle and Mars) insist that we feed food that is full of fillers to bulk up the food, and creates obesity? We know good food helps weight loss and general health, and yet that is not the same for our animals, who we have a duty of care for.
It literally makes no sense.
Edit: dog food pulled!
http://wsbt.com/news/nation-world/dog-foods-pulled-from-shelves-nationwide-after-investigation-finds-euthanasia-drug