Team_Dobby wrote:-_- urgh . . . . .
I wrote a codeword as my first rule and even wrote in big letters CODEWORD, and no one even pretends to read the rules. Yes they are long, but stupid trades like the ones you rulebreakers send are WHY they are so long . . . . -_- *grumble* I got alot of ranting done today, and I didn't even explode. I'm proud of myself xD

Marlena5390 wrote:
Actually, this is my real opinion:







.png)






~ t r o u b l e ~ wrote:Team_Dobby wrote:-_- urgh . . . . .
I wrote a codeword as my first rule and even wrote in big letters CODEWORD, and no one even pretends to read the rules. Yes they are long, but stupid trades like the ones you rulebreakers send are WHY they are so long . . . . -_- *grumble* I got alot of ranting done today, and I didn't even explode. I'm proud of myself xD
no offence, but they are long. and thats just the type of members i dont trade with. sorry.



Saw you´re searching the green Dragon. I have one. I would trade it for the BA. Everyone else is paying Moonswirls, so you get a perfect deal.
I´m not everyone else and I don´t have anyone seen paying Moonswirls for it. That´s just crazy. They are not worth this.
I don´t trade my BA or any other Pets, that are not in my Trade-Groups, sorry.
Oh I know many guys, that are paying Moonswirls for that Dragon. It is that Rare!
Okay...if not your BA, what about your Yellow Sorbet? It is worth less than a BA!
Maybe...either way this Persons are that desperate or they were ninja´d. And for sure a BA is worth more than a Yellow Sorbet, that´s why the Yellow Sorbet is VR and from July and the BA is Rare and from December. Sure.
Your Sorbet is from 2010, so it is worth less!
Not for me. It is worth the same as the Original.
You don´t get it, get it please. And leave me alone. I don´t trade crazy amounts for that Dragon, I´m not that desperate.
Have a nice day and bye.
Leopardfeather wrote:Saw you´re searching the green Dragon. I have one. I would trade it for the BA. Everyone else is paying Moonswirls, so you get a perfect deal.
Oh. My. God.
What´s going on?
My reply:I´m not everyone else and I don´t have anyone seen paying Moonswirls for it. That´s just crazy. They are not worth this.
I don´t trade my BA or any other Pets, that are not in my Trade-Groups, sorry.
Clear or?
This came back:Oh I know many guys, that are paying Moonswirls for that Dragon. It is that Rare!
Okay...if not your BA, what about your Yellow Sorbet? It is worth less than a BA!
O__oMaybe...either way this Persons are that desperate or they were ninja´d. And for sure a BA is worth more than a Yellow Sorbet, that´s why the Yellow Sorbet is VR and from July and the BA is Rare and from December. Sure.
~sighs~ I should have said, "Leave me alone" xDYour Sorbet is from 2010, so it is worth less!Not for me. It is worth the same as the Original.
You don´t get it, get it please. And leave me alone. I don´t trade crazy amounts for that Dragon, I´m not that desperate.
Have a nice day and bye.
![]()
I think they are trying to ninja me...


Widgy.Henderson wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=6231342&userid=46134&signature=LCaKikHm_0bd6QqgsToasQ
I don't think people even try anymore >.>
failtrader wrote:i did read your rules but i wanted to try.
My response wrote:-->No, I'm not trading a rare for 200 very commons, commons and uncommons. Rare for rare, very rare for very rare. Of course, this rule might bend depending on the age of the pet. An '08 uncommon is sure as heck worth a rare.-->Age counts too, so don't expect me to accept a trade where you offer an '11 common for an '09 common-->Items are definitely worth more than a few commons and uncommons, or at least to me they are. So don't offer that for them, I'll cancel.
is this okay it is fair![]()
No thanks.
person wrote:IT WAS FAIR AS
Widgy.Henderson wrote:Just because a trade is fair doesn't mean I have to accept.
person wrote:BUT YOU NEVER ACCEPT SO :p
Widgy.Henderson wrote:Because I never feel like trading the pets you want for the pets you offer, or you break my rules.
person wrote:i havnt
Widgy.Henderson wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=5530188&userid=46134&signature=uhhCH1Kw73pFnZl-d988NA-->No, I'm not trading a rare for 200 very commons, commons and uncommons. Rare for rare, very rare for very rare. Of course, this rule might bend depending on the age of the pet. An '08 uncommon is sure as heck worth a rare.
In others, you somehow manage to forget to look at age. Please stop PMing me.
person wrote:what are u on
Widgy.Henderson wrote:Please stop PMing me.
Users browsing this forum: reaptherisk and 3 guests