Current Event: π° Easter π₯
Forum rules
Remember: This is not a trading board, so please don't post about pets you're trading!
by clues » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:44 pm
unpopular theory:
could it possibly be a team of both the dragon and the boutique dog?
the boutique dog was my original theory and it has plenty of evidence so let me dig a little deeper to connect them;
shells and kelp were both confirmed items that were used in the crime. i believe wood also was, the cut off word on the note. the dragon had wood, however the boutique dog did not.
the dragon might not have been totally in on it.. maybe he could have just lent the boutique dog the wood?
either way, both of them seem to not be too concerned about the situation. the dragon was cracking jokes, and the boutique dog seemed quite happy through it all.
IN THE MIDDLE OF WRITING THIS IVE NOTICED THE "FLASHES OF RED ANNOUNCEMENT"
although squiddy make be red, you know who else is red?
the dragon.
although it very well could be a possibility, i honestly hope it's not the dragon. i love him sm
xβ
β
hi, i'm lexi! / any prns / college student
βΊ the rose-set road will bend around
the earth you knew is waiting for you, dear
trd me! credit
-

clues
-
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 10:28 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
-
by holmes221B » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:46 pm
of . course . wrote:unpopular theory:
could it possibly be a team of both the dragon and the boutique dog?
the boutique dog was my original theory and it has plenty of evidence so let me dig a little deeper to connect them;
shells and kelp were both confirmed items that were used in the crime. i believe wood also was, the cut off word on the note. the dragon had wood, however the boutique dog did not.
the dragon might not have been totally in on it.. maybe he could have just lent the boutique dog the wood?
either way, both of them seem to not be too concerned about the situation. the dragon was cracking jokes, and the boutique dog seemed quite happy through it all.
IN THE MIDDLE OF WRITING THIS IVE NOTICED THE "FLASHES OF RED ANNOUNCEMENT"
although squiddy make be red, you know who else is red?
the dragon.
although it very well could be a possibility, i honestly hope it's not the dragon. i love him sm
I see your theory, but what about the tentacles?
"Sherlock Holmes. Surely you've heard of me?"
xx
xx
-

holmes221B
-
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:57 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by holmes221B » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:47 pm
Spear of Justice wrote:What might be the reason the witness wants to be anonymous? (All we know is that it's a 'he'.) Does this witness fear some kind of consequence if his identity is revealed?
I feel like he or she is an accomplice.
"Sherlock Holmes. Surely you've heard of me?"
xx
xx
-

holmes221B
-
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 2:57 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by xXocea » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:47 pm
of . course . wrote:unpopular theory:
could it possibly be a team of both the dragon and the boutique dog?
the boutique dog was my original theory and it has plenty of evidence so let me dig a little deeper to connect them;
shells and kelp were both confirmed items that were used in the crime. i believe wood also was, the cut off word on the note. the dragon had wood, however the boutique dog did not.
the dragon might not have been totally in on it.. maybe he could have just lent the boutique dog the wood?
either way, both of them seem to not be too concerned about the situation. the dragon was cracking jokes, and the boutique dog seemed quite happy through it all.
IN THE MIDDLE OF WRITING THIS IVE NOTICED THE "FLASHES OF RED ANNOUNCEMENT"
although squiddy make be red, you know who else is red?
the dragon.
although it very well could be a possibility, i honestly hope it's not the dragon. i love him sm
I agree with this theory.
My main sus' were the Boutique dog, and the Dragon.
They are sort of both kinda happy about it. (Like the only happy people that have anything to say about the crime - Panopea is happy but she didn't get a dialogue change)
-

xXocea
-
- Posts: 5404
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:03 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by clues » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:48 pm
holmes221B wrote:of . course . wrote:unpopular theory:
could it possibly be a team of both the dragon and the boutique dog?
the boutique dog was my original theory and it has plenty of evidence so let me dig a little deeper to connect them;
shells and kelp were both confirmed items that were used in the crime. i believe wood also was, the cut off word on the note. the dragon had wood, however the boutique dog did not.
the dragon might not have been totally in on it.. maybe he could have just lent the boutique dog the wood?
either way, both of them seem to not be too concerned about the situation. the dragon was cracking jokes, and the boutique dog seemed quite happy through it all.
IN THE MIDDLE OF WRITING THIS IVE NOTICED THE "FLASHES OF RED ANNOUNCEMENT"
although squiddy make be red, you know who else is red?
the dragon.
although it very well could be a possibility, i honestly hope it's not the dragon. i love him sm
I see your theory, but what about the tentacles?
this is something that i've said before, but the boutique dog is a designer after all! she could have created false tentacles to place the blame on others.
the culprit also could have easily stolen tentacles from the chef's set-up.
xβ
β
hi, i'm lexi! / any prns / college student
βΊ the rose-set road will bend around
the earth you knew is waiting for you, dear
trd me! credit
-

clues
-
- Posts: 3776
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 10:28 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
-
by hongjoongie. » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:48 pm
holmes221B wrote:Spear of Justice wrote:What might be the reason the witness wants to be anonymous? (All we know is that it's a 'he'.) Does this witness fear some kind of consequence if his identity is revealed?
I feel like he or she is an accomplice.
why would the witness even be there? apparently, (according to the pinboard, at least) chef calamari was the last to leave. if he isn't the eyewitness, then who else could it have been? and why would they have been there during the crime?
very!! inactive!! sorry to anyone
who has tried to contact me/trade with me.
i'm trying to get back into cs, please be
patient with me <3
cat cr.
-

hongjoongie.
-
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:54 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by xXocea » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:49 pm
a. hamilton wrote:- eyewitness: "flash of red" Calamari has a red mane, which is around his face. most people look towards the top of bodies to identify an unknown thing to them. Moving fast would blur the colors.
If fast movement blurs colours he'd probably appear more purple. Especially with his particular shades.
-

xXocea
-
- Posts: 5404
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 11:03 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests