2017 Summer Event - Deep Sea Investigation Squad Unite!

[VVorthless]

Oh my there's also wood there

oh my goodness
i think the torn off piece of the note might say "also found at the scene: wood"

um um um um

The only person who asks for all the things found is the dragon

Oh dang... It might say wood!!
Looking at it carefully I see the beginning of a w. Possibly a d at the end. Then two unknown letters between.

Likely wood. BUT they were working on the stage with wood? Remember we were asked to help with rope and wood!!

[/quote]
Wood is in the background as well so it's definitely wood. And there isn't rope so I doubt that's it

[holmes221B]

I'm going to go on full detective mode right now as well.


• The lion cub would be the most obvious choice, though I can see why people would choose her. From the posts that I saw, people say that she is a troublemaker and that she would like attention from her mother. I can see that, but the most obvious choice might not turn out to be the right one.
  
• Panopea is a squid, so she has tentacles. The only bit of information that you clearly know about her is that she takes care of the pearl game in the castle courtyard. She remains on the suspect list since she has tentacles, and that is pretty incriminating.
  
• Wade is a cat with tentacles. They are in the same situation as Panopea: not enough information was released to show their true personality and attitude. Since the tentacles are incriminating, they remain on the suspect list.
  
• The Old Dragon. I think he is the most unlikely suspect to have committed the crime, so I also doubt that he did it. However, you never know.
  
• The owner of Barnacle Boutique also has to remain on the suspect list since she asks for two food items from the chef. The food is the incriminating evidence for her.
  
• The Chef. Now, he is the one who makes the food, obviously, but that means that he stays on the suspect list. Like the Boutique owner, the incriminating evidence is the food.
  
• Avian and Totoro are also unlikely to have committed the crime, so they are off of the list.
  
• And now, Cuttler. He has tentacles, and you can never be too sure. The ones helping in the investigation might not be who you think they are, so he remains on the list, just in case. Plus, he has tentacles, and that's incriminating.
  
  And now, here is my theory. We know that three people have tentacles: Cuttler, Panopea, and Wade. However, these three didn't ask for food. The Boutique owner and the Chef do not have tentacles, but they asked for food. So, if the tentacles and the food are actual hints, then this means that this is a two-man crime. Two people might have done the deed, but this is only a theory of mine. So, that means that someone with tentacles and someone who asked for food must have done it, but it could also have been only one person. If my theory of a two-man crime is correct, here are the combinations. Now remember, these combinations are based on the tentacle and food theory:
  
• Cuttler and the Chef
  
• Cuttler and the Boutique Owner
  
• Panopea and the Chef
  
• Panopea and the Boutique Owner
  
• Wade and the Chef
  
• Wade and the Boutique Owner
  
  There are six outcomes for the two-man crime theory. If my theory of a one-man crime is correct, then here is the list of suspects:
  
• The Chef
  
• The Boutique Owner
  
• Wade
  
• Cuttler
  
• Panopea
  
  Woah. Okay, that was totally full detective mode. Sorry about that.

it's fine! there certainly is a possibility that more than one pet committed the crime.
until we have more evidence, we can't really let anyone off the hook. however, i certainly wouldn't be surprised if two pets were behind this.

Yeah, and lets not forget the Jamboree Organizer either. He wanted shells and stuff to create decorations; however, he is probably more unlikely to commit the crime than the five in the list.

[Meowrails]

If Cuttler really was the culprit, they probably wouldn't tell the news about the tentacle prints

[kiribaku]

Barely anyone brought this up, but what about squiddy? Squiddy wasn't mentioned at all! He hasn't said anything himself either.

I personally think Squiddy is a bit shy, He helps at the Kelp Forest. Although we all love Squiddy He can be a suspect of this case.

[raccoon bandit]

Quick consideration-- Could just be baseless thinking, but underneath the breaking news, the names for the memos keep changing... This could mean that the reportings are unreliable? So the tentacle clue is under suspicion accuracy wise for me..

Edit;; Breaking news also says there was a flash of red near the instruments last night?? Who?? (I don't want it to be the dragon but... He's already committed a crime...?)

[kiribaku]

If Cuttler really was the culprit, they probably wouldn't tell the news about the tentacle prints

I agree, It's just people Fighting about who it is Wade, Or one of the squids.

[Pistol Annie #1 NPC]

Just in from the breaking news: An anonymous eyewitness swore he saw a flash of red near the instruments last night.

[xXocea]

Uh oh...

Tentacles... flash of red.

Squiddy this ain't lookin' good for you!!

[lady gaga]

just thought of this haha

Cuttler rhymes with butler and butlers usually do the crimes in crimes novels. (not all, but its kind of/kinda not expected.)

[holmes221B]

Guys, the news changed. This changes things. An anonymous eye witness? I feel like that is suspicious. And a flash of red? Could be real or fake, depending on the witness. Now, let's see some possiblities. The Chef has some red, and the Dragon has some red, too, but I'm pretty sure the red would be the Chef's. The eye witness report might be corrupted if this was a two-man crime. The accomplice might have been the eye witness; however, the accomplice wouldn't give away their partner, so it would have to be someone else who does NOT have red. However, the eye witness might not have been an accomplice, so the witness report might be true.

Edit: Actually, yeah, it could also have been Squiddy! HE IS NOW ON THE SUSPECT LIST.