The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[Eagle's Eye]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63644696&userid=869270&signature=HrldWHwm0-Kpolw5n1lwTw

is this fair? idk, no idea

Most people won't pay that much for a zodiac and would value it at one 2009 rare. The top is currently worth 4 2009 rares. That's the value of a low advent

[Bastiodon]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63557855&userid=839319&signature=qro3n_nMLNJoWxlOeWk5ww


I don't know what I'm doing

[Nightingale-Call]

Is this fair? I received it today but it doesn't look like they read my rules. I don't know if it's unfair to me or them.

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63648432&userid=869812&signature=WULb2oa2UXWbi7Ht1lIl8w

Value wise they're overpaying, a lot. The horse is a rerelease from late 2009. A 2009 rare is worth 8 2010 uncommons. Your side is only worth around one 2010 uncommon

Anymore Opinions?

[cryptid.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63646524&userid=707995&signature=t63IWyRPHe7AIN6QQjzbSg
Thanks!

bump

A 2014 store pet is worth a late 2009 rare. Your two collared dogs are both worth August 2009 rares due to their extended release. One of your collar dogs would be fair for the store dragon, which leaves a August 2009 rare and a January 2009 rare for their February very rare. Value wise they are overpaying slightly (your recent pets don't make a difference here) and I'd personally take this due to the German sheperd's demand


Thanks, second opinion?

[Eagle's Eye]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63649112&userid=850357&signature=mU7OasXybRFnY6CGv7q-TA
how fair is this?

Unfair to you. The top is worth an early 2010 rare. Your side is worth a late 2009 rare. The uncommons don't matter here

[Charra]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63646569&userid=148724&signature=Pw9LgwtWunbqKvBbvHpVBw

Are three fair for one?

[Eagle's Eye]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63646569&userid=148724&signature=Pw9LgwtWunbqKvBbvHpVBw

Are three fair for one?

Very unfair to you. Top=mid 2010 rare. Your side=late 2009 rare+late 2010 rare. Your side is close to being worth 3 times of theirs

[Eaglespirit]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63649112&userid=850357&signature=mU7OasXybRFnY6CGv7q-TA
how fair is this?

Unfair to you. The top is worth an early 2010 rare. Your side is worth a late 2009 rare. The uncommons don't matter here

So the value of one of my stores is equal to theirs? Or would I have to add something?

[Eagle's Eye]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63649112&userid=850357&signature=mU7OasXybRFnY6CGv7q-TA
how fair is this?

Unfair to you. The top is worth an early 2010 rare. Your side is worth a late 2009 rare. The uncommons don't matter here

So the value of one of my stores is equal to theirs? Or would I have to add something?

No. 2015 store pet=early 2010 rare. 2017 store pet=late 2010 rare. Based on this current trade, they need to add roughly a '09 uncommon/early 2010 uncommon ish.

Hey! I'm pretty sure this trade is unfair to me,
how do I fix it? (by taking stuff off)


http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... cmDkqJB6zw

This is unfair to you value wise. Their store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare, so your 2009 rat is overpay. However excluding your 2009 pet, all other pets on your side don't even come close to the value of the store pet or the '12 rare.
Remove the 2012 bat and the store pet on the top
Bottom: keep 4 2016 commons, 2017 common, a 2016 rare

so, am I overpaying, or are they?

I answered that in the first sentence of my reply ^^''
"This is unfair to you value wise."
Demand is up to you and your partner, since not everyone likes rats

[cryptid.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63646524&userid=707995&signature=t63IWyRPHe7AIN6QQjzbSg
Thanks!

bump

A 2014 store pet is worth a late 2009 rare. Your two collared dogs are both worth August 2009 rares due to their extended release. One of your collar dogs would be fair for the store dragon, which leaves a August 2009 rare and a January 2009 rare for their February very rare. Value wise they are overpaying slightly (your recent pets don't make a difference here) and I'd personally take this due to the German sheperd's demand


Thanks, second opinion?