I'mALittleUnsteady wrote:Would this be fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ImNjSbpA_Q
Unfair to them. Just the very first 2013 uncommon is overpay
I'mALittleUnsteady wrote:Would this be fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ImNjSbpA_Q
ToothyToothless wrote:vaiill wrote:ToothyToothless wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63523303&userid=729040&signature=T_GopniBqcTOSLcIwQc_gg
I know this is unfIr, but if they were to add a 2009 rare would it be fair?
Adding an 09 rare on their side would make it unfair to them, maybe another 2010 uncommon would be fine. Probs get a second opinion
They don't have any '10 u commons but that one.. would it still be unfair if they added the '09 Rare and took away the uncommon?
strange things wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63525905&userid=686721&signature=JgJ98-qbeTT0KkuvgYFztQ
adiebaby11 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63516589&userid=826971&signature=pDngR4WnqdLap4GYYmlDig Is this fair demand wise?
Fwutter wrote:Llamawings wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63525154&userid=819500&signature=usO1vP_cX1Cs99ffO-m5iQ
how much does the orange nick cake dog go for C:?6-7 '09 rares. If you're asking about pet worths,ask in this thread instead of the fair trade thread.
ToothyToothless wrote:strange things wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63525905&userid=686721&signature=JgJ98-qbeTT0KkuvgYFztQ
I see it as fair. 2009 very Rares can go for 2 2009 Raresadiebaby11 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63516589&userid=826971&signature=pDngR4WnqdLap4GYYmlDig Is this fair demand wise?
It looked like they are overpaying. Personally I value warriors the same regardless of rarity unless it's rare. So I would personally consider it a swap.
Users browsing this forum: bunnyboy, Scarlet Janefox, TANKMEN, ~Trompy and 7 guests