Discussion about the Pets, Items, Dress-ups, Events, Site, Forum or other CS features!
by spacecatmint » Sat May 27, 2017 9:17 am
Kalliope wrote:Personally, I wouldn't take the Bee trade. If I'm not mistaken, the BEG is a TD as well, so I"m assuming people will pay more for it. I value your side at about 5-6 sorbets, which is what the Bee is worth. Unless you are looking to trade up, I would take it but I would honestly wait out for a better offer, like a trade down.
the BEG is actually not a truedate, as its last release date was in August 2008 c: it's a 2008 re-release.
the bee is valued at 2 nons going by the list, and goes for fair trades. I believe the bee side is overpaying. the BEG is usually valued at around a non including demand, and in that case the raven would have to be valued at a non for the trade to be fair. I searched around in the auction forums and on the pet worth-thread and the raven seems to be going for about a sorbet - which is 1/3 of a non.
but demand is not anything concrete - it depends fully on how you value the pets for yourself!
❝ those windermere peaks look like a perfect place to cry. ❞━━━ she/they . adult .
flight rising . only semi-active rn
-

spacecatmint
-
- Posts: 14531
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:31 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Joof » Sat May 27, 2017 9:19 am
turtle... wrote:Kalliope wrote:Personally, I wouldn't take the Bee trade. If I'm not mistaken, the BEG is a TD as well, so I"m assuming people will pay more for it. I value your side at about 5-6 sorbets, which is what the Bee is worth. Unless you are looking to trade up, I would take it but I would honestly wait out for a better offer, like a trade down.
the BEG is actually not a truedate, as its last release date was in August 2008 c: it's a 2008 re-release.
the bee is valued at 2 nons going by the list, and goes for fair trades. I believe the bee side is overpaying. the BEG is usually valued at around a non including demand, and in that case the raven would have to be valued at a non for the trade to be fair. I searched around in the auction forums and on the pet worth-thread and the raven seems to be going for about a sorbet - which is 1/3 of a non.
but demand is not anything concrete - it depends fully on how you value the pets for yourself!
I agree with turtle... That's what i've also seen.
Just a little reminder: the list already takes demand into account. Anything re-applied is up to the trading partners (:
-
Joof
-
- Posts: 6589
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:02 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by spacecatmint » Sat May 27, 2017 9:32 am
Nbazoo wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=63503249&userid=874164&signature=eWkaFw0pPgsjgPs6RKi6Vg
Is this fair at all? someone help... im new xD
unfair to you. their store pet is worth a late 2010 rare, and therefore they are only paying half of what your pet is worth. one late 2009 rare is worth two late 2010 rares. they need to add another recent store pet or a late 2010 rare.
❝ those windermere peaks look like a perfect place to cry. ❞━━━ she/they . adult .
flight rising . only semi-active rn
-

spacecatmint
-
- Posts: 14531
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:31 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: lykoifish, TANKMEN and 11 guests