














Inkdragon wrote:Inkdragon wrote:Trade
Demand wise is this fair (is the red x in more demand or the angel advent)
hybridtheory wrote:Hi, I'm not the best with non-rare pets with older dates- I'd appreciate any help I could get with this ^^
hybridtheory wrote:hybridtheory wrote:Hi, I'm not the best with non-rare pets with older dates- I'd appreciate any help I could get with this ^^
Phil Lester wrote:would you personally accept this?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... TguCBqWdLg
KodiakCentral wrote:
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
☆ Jovan
☆ A bi disaster
☆ He/Him
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
—> Instagram <—
—> Art Shop <—
—> Storepet Collection <—
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁F
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁

☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:hybridtheory wrote:hybridtheory wrote:Hi, I'm not the best with non-rare pets with older dates- I'd appreciate any help I could get with this ^^
Unfair to you. I value an uncommon as two commons, so their 2011 common cancels out half the worth of your 2011 uncommon. That makes it a 2011 common for a 2015 common, 2016 uncommon, and 3 2017 uncommons. Valuing a rare as four uncommons, a 2011 common is worth a 2014 rare. Their remaining side is worth less than a 2016 rare.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests