bendy. wrote:
bendy. wrote:
Tylerr Joseph wrote:This is a fair trade right? I'm pretty sure they are overpaying but I would like a second opinion
Kalliope wrote:ToothyToothless wrote:Tylerr Joseph wrote:This is a fair trade right? I'm pretty sure they are overpaying but I would like a second opinion
You actually may be better off keeping your pets due to the flower pot having bad demand. Check with another player
Please stop giving uneducated advice as I said here.Please only give educated advice.
Demand is user based. Some users love the pot, others wouldn't mind it, and then there are others who just don't like it. You can't mark a pet with it having poor or good demand because of this. I on the other hand think the ur flowerpot is cute so I wouldn't mind it. It's worth 2 sorbets+green toxic. The user is overpaying by a sorbet+green toxic. Honestly, I would take it since if you find the right user who likes the Flowerpot, you can get it's full value.
Horror wrote:Horror wrote:What should have been added on my side?
~☾☆Tԋҽ Mσσɳ Gαȥҽɾ☆☾~ wrote:Is this a fair trade?
I'm assuming it's an over on their part with the VR, but can someone explain that cat's value?
I've never seen that particular valentine sitting cat before.
ToothyToothless wrote:Tylerr Joseph wrote:This is a fair trade right? I'm pretty sure they are overpaying but I would like a second opinion
You actually may be better off keeping your pets due to the flower pot having bad demand. Check with another player
chuuya wrote:is this fair, if not what should they remove or add?
all replies and help is appreciated!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... wkJlwUGV-Qreally need an answer asap, thanks for anyone that helps!
Users browsing this forum: Konar and 5 guests