TrixiePixie wrote:☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:TrixiePixie wrote:I was told this was an unfair trade, but no explanation as to why, so I'm wondering if someone could help me with that so I can make better offers in the future...
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... -bLQS3hWBQ
It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare
okay, thank you. I was wondering about that, I just have a hard time trying to figure out older pets worth in newer pets.
what could I do to make it more fair? would removing one of the VC 12 pets bring it more to level?
.Aries. wrote:XxShadowClanxX wrote:XxShadowClanxX wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61649162&userid=707995&signature=z_V_UbbU_F47FCSXMDNbeQ
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61546379&userid=707995&signature=e0HlIe1mSw005rLS3V7JMw
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61648205&userid=707995&signature=5eN4Y9cv-M_jqT-zaFd3Bw
I have an auction and I don't know which one is the best <3
GIFTING ANYONE WHO HELPS
I would personally take the second one, since it is the most overpay (despite having 2 sitting cats on your side), but if you dont want to trade the two of them, four is best.
thanks second opinion?





Rusticsmile67 wrote:is this fair demand wise? All help is appreciated




chickensmoothienope wrote:A little help w/ this trade pls c:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... MNf8jFhEjw
Users browsing this forum: dwarjam, Minimanta, reaptherisk and 1 guest