Discussion about the Pets, Items, Dress-ups, Events, Site, Forum or other CS features!
by cryptid. » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:07 am
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:Value wise huge overpay on the top. Your side combined is worth one mid/late 2009 rare. Demand is up to you and your partner
thanks, second opinion?
Hello! I'm cryptid. she/her/hers
I am a college student studying
wildlife/fisheries biology
I enjoy: cryptids, dead by daylight,
resident evil, and the cat returns
My FlightRisingtrading away (almost) anything FR
Trade ThreadCurrently looking for WL past event pets
Auction ThreadNo auctions currently
-

cryptid.
-
- Posts: 13763
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 12:45 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
-
by Vega• » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:08 am
wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD[/quote]
Sorry, could you explain that again? I don't understand, there are no 2008 or 2010s?[/quote]
Their Nick pet is worth a 2009 rare, so that pet alone is huge overpay for a 2013 rare.[/quote]
Oh okay thank you!!
*・゜゚・*:.。..。.:*・'(*゚▽゚*)'・*:.。. .。.:*・゜゚・*
"Hereos Never Die"
*・゜゚・*:.。..。.:*・'(*゚▽゚*)'・*:.。. .。.:*・゜゚・*
-

Vega•
-
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:34 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Eagle's Eye » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:11 am
TrixiePixie wrote:☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare
okay, thank you. I was wondering about that, I just have a hard time trying to figure out older pets worth in newer pets.
what could I do to make it more fair? would removing one of the VC 12 pets bring it more to level?
The easiest way to make it fair would be to leave two 2016 commons+2017 uncommon+two 2017 commons on their side. That'd make it a 2017 rare
A 2013 very common is worth a 2017 rare. So one 2012 very common is worth the value of two 2017 rares
Personally I'd suggest not trading across such an age gap as most people don't really like it
│
│
│
│
│
│
hi
hi
hi
SEEK WHAT SETS - ─
YOUR SOUL ON FIRE┌─────────┐│
│
Chinese | GMT
full time foodie
fire type pkmn! :>
│
│
└─────────┘Themes /
credit
-

Eagle's Eye
-
- Posts: 45994
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:34 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by musicgurl333 » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:15 am
Fwutter wrote:musicgurl333 wrote:Very unfair to you. The '11 store pet is worth at least an early '09 rare, but you could likely get more for it. The lion on their side is worth about 20C$.
I would say otherwise, all store pets have high demand, but i would say this particular set has the lowest. The lion they are offering his very high demand, also a 2011 store pet is worth an earl '09 rare, i would say the person trading you is overpaying demand wise and rarity wise
Even if the store pet doesn't have the best demand for a store pet it's decent, and the '09 dog on the top doesn't have any special demand. Plus even with good demand the lion isn't worth 40C$.
I am a holibomber!
I have gifted _33_ people.
I have received _26_ gifts.
-

musicgurl333
-
- Posts: 33638
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:38 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests