Discussion about the Pets, Items, Dress-ups, Events, Site, Forum or other CS features!
by Vega• » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:02 am
kody ♛ wrote:wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD
Sorry, could you explain that again? I don't understand, there are no 2008 or 2010s?
*・゜゚・*:.。..。.:*・'(*゚▽゚*)'・*:.。. .。.:*・゜゚・*
"Hereos Never Die"
*・゜゚・*:.。..。.:*・'(*゚▽゚*)'・*:.。. .。.:*・゜゚・*
-

Vega•
-
- Posts: 805
- Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 8:34 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by james sunderland » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:05 am
Fwutter wrote:I would have to say no this isn't fair, those store pet dears have
extremely high demand, originally it would be worth an early '10 rare, but i don't really think this all adds up to even an '11 rare
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:Unfair to you, a 2015 store pet is worth a mid 2010 rare and their side doesn't add up to that
Thanks you two! helped me to decide :>
-

james sunderland
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 5:33 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Eagle's Eye » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:05 am
Aqurke wrote:kody ♛ wrote:wait for a second answer, but
the nick pets original date is 2009 or 2010
i believe so just that alone would be overpay so the rest is overpay.
unless this 2013 pet has some unknown rarity I don't know about hmmmm.. ? XD
Sorry, could you explain that again? I don't understand, there are no 2008 or 2010s?
Their Nick pet is worth a 2009 rare, so that pet alone is huge overpay for a 2013 rare.
│
│
│
│
│
│
hi
hi
hi
SEEK WHAT SETS - ─
YOUR SOUL ON FIRE┌─────────┐│
│
Chinese | GMT
full time foodie
fire type pkmn! :>
│
│
└─────────┘Themes /
credit
-

Eagle's Eye
-
- Posts: 45994
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:34 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by TrixiePixie » Mon Apr 10, 2017 4:06 am
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:It's very unfair to you value wise.
Valuing an uncommon as two commons and a rare as 4 uncommons
Your side is worth two 2015 rares. Their side is worth roughly one 2016 rare
okay, thank you. I was wondering about that, I just have a hard time trying to figure out older pets worth in newer pets.
what could I do to make it more fair? would removing one of the VC 12 pets bring it more to level?
-

TrixiePixie
-
- Posts: 6372
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 1:01 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CoffeeEX, LunaLate and 0 guests