Blackbirdflyinghigh wrote:Blackbirdflyinghigh wrote:Blackbirdflyinghigh wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=60984369&userid=752493&signature=5UCzbMiBX76XdLYKJJIyMg
Just got this and I am bad with doing unknown rarities. Would this be a fair swap?
Gifting anyone who responds with facts.
I don't need a gift. They have 17 pets and you have 16 pets from this month. Monthly adopts are usually omg so common-uncommon, and very, very rarely would a rare ever come into existence. An early 2014 common would technically worth 8 early 2017 commons, so that's huge overpay value wise on the top. Personally I'd definitely accept this as newborn pets are barely worth anything compared to older pets
aktori wrote:is this
fair?if not what needs to be added/removed to make it fair?
thank you in advance <3
Their cat had an extended release until August 2009. The question here is, how would you value a very rare warrior? Personally I'd say it's definitely unfair to them, as very rare warriors could go for huge overpays. Uncommon warriors go for overpay too, but not as much. Two of your 2015 store pets would be worth a 2009 rare. So you have two 2009 rares+'09 uncommon warrior+2011 rare+2016 rare. The 2011 and 2016 pets could literally be ignored here due how less their value is compared to a '09. Your 2009 warrior could easily go for a 2009 rare, so demand wise you have at least three 2009 rares on your side. I've seen vr warriors go for 4 2009 rares. How to make it fair would be up to you and your partner since demand is a personal thing.
Charliebear11 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/edittrade.php?id=61003469 :?
Do not post your trade more than once on each page.
This is the wrong link, click share trade.