| Artist | Happily Wrathful [gallery] |
| Time spent | 10 minutes |
| Drawing sessions | 1 |
| One person likes this | Log in to vote for this drawing |
Rainbowpitbull wrote:But if the earth couldn't move, there wouldn't be season or days.


TheLastSilhouette wrote:That's a weird looking fish
metonymy wrote:obviously missing the turtle underneath it
rather nice illustration of passe heresy though. i would advise against trying to start an all-out debate on the topic in the oekaki; this is probably more suited to the discussion forum. it's a good piece for the short time though, and i would be very interested to see what you do with more time.
Mute wrote:I.... I'm
This has broken my soul sorry there's no hope...
...hope for me explaining how astonishing the art is!!! I love the colors, though I'd love to see a little more substance to it. Cant wait to see how you advance in the future. : 3
metonymy wrote:unfortunately the controversy may come to you if one presses the subject tbqh. this site has a large christian population and i imagine many of them are similarly unimpressed to see this pop up with the name of christianity attached to it. geocentrism has been passe for quite a few centuries; a flat earth, for quite a few millennia, if you ask the ancient greeks. neither system started out as christianity, and neither system makes terribly good christianity. (an aside because i can already hear one "but what about" - medieval scholarship, you must understand, is not so much about trying to figure out the truth around us, but rather categorizing that truth and trying to get it all to work within the same framework and system. when you've got ancient greek, ancient roman, late roman, anglo-saxon, viking, jewish, frank, middle eastern, muslim, pagan, indian, chinese, - okay, you get the idea. medieval scholars were more interested in making this all fit together, somehow. they did not create a tasty 7 layer dip of truth. it was more like a kitchen sink leftover scramble of sadness.) this, for the record, is not christianity. it hasn't been christianity since around 1600, and that's being generous. that is just geocentrism; a flat earth has been disproven much more thoroughly and actually was never common knowledge among basically any western civ peoples at any time, and i only say western civ because that is what i have been taught - however it is easily seen in any place that has a harbor, and ships big enough to see coming on the horizon, which is... bow-shaped, even to the human eye. i could go on here but, again, trying to avoid a full-drawn debate, and i'm getting the oddest feeling that whatever i may bring up will be pooh-poohed as lies and slander anyhow.
just your friendly reminder that although biblical verses are being used, this is not christian belief. believe me, the vatican worked this out quite thoroughly some time ago. you can ask them for full details.
one is free to express whichever position one so chooses on these boards, and i do not wish to start a big debate here in the least. but if one expresses strange opinions and hitches a certain philosophical term to them, it should be no surprise when someone like me comes by and says to the public that this is not standard by any means. you are free to believe as you choose; i will bother this thread no longer. i merely felt the need to make a clear and explicit point about the theology brought up here under a certain name.
an interesting piece of art nonetheless.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests