go to new thread!

[z i m]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

[Bunnyhop627]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

The second one is better. It is many main lists, while the other one doesn't add up anywhere close to the other. (fruit has bad demand.) The last trade was the best with the quantity. I would seek a second opinion on that, though.


nyctophilia

Unfair to them with the 3 month rule, but Malks are worth a little more and horses are not the most wanted species. However, your trade is fair.

[i don't know her]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

i disagree; i'd say the first is better; the aussie on their side is huge. and the lists on the second trade are kinda low value [i.e. bunnies, which demand is low on], and the only lists I see that are moderately good demand are the angel advent, wwa, sorbet, and dogs excluding the cake dog.
but honestly i'm probably wrong XD.

[Nicnova]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

i disagree; i'd say the first is better; the aussie on their side is huge. and the lists on the second trade are kinda low value [i.e. bunnies, which demand is low on], and the only lists I see that are moderately good demand are the angel advent, wwa, sorbet, and dogs excluding the cake dog.
but honestly i'm probably wrong XD.

I agree with you. Unless I'm missing something in the second trade, the first trade has a lot higher value.

[very]

Would this have been a fair trade?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Y-YKKfK49g

If not what would have made it fair?

[veggie]

Could I please get some input on this trade?
Thank you!

[i don't know her]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

i disagree; i'd say the first is better; the aussie on their side is huge. and the lists on the second trade are kinda low value [i.e. bunnies, which demand is low on], and the only lists I see that are moderately good demand are the angel advent, wwa, sorbet, and dogs excluding the cake dog.
but honestly i'm probably wrong XD.

I agree with you. Unless I'm missing something in the second trade, the first trade has a lot higher value.

phew ok XD

[z i m]

is this good? Or should I take a cerb instead of the Aussie and shima b-wolf?
or should I take this one instead?

i disagree; i'd say the first is better; the aussie on their side is huge. and the lists on the second trade are kinda low value [i.e. bunnies, which demand is low on], and the only lists I see that are moderately good demand are the angel advent, wwa, sorbet, and dogs excluding the cake dog.
but honestly i'm probably wrong XD.

I agree with you. Unless I'm missing something in the second trade, the first trade has a lot higher value.

in the first trade, should I keep the Aussie and shima b-wolf, or have a red cerb in place of it?

[maninkari]

Would this have been a fair trade?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Y-YKKfK49g

If not what would have made it fair?

No, it was unfair. The toxic is a main list while the grinner is a low September, and the toxic generally has better demand than the grinner. I'm not sure what would've made it fair though^^

[i don't know her]

hi! is this fair?
thanks for any help!

in the first trade, should I keep the Aussie and shima b-wolf, or have a red cerb in place of it?

in place of which pet, the aussie, shima, or grapes?