da024
Are these berries toxic?
Toxic? Hardly. Well, that really depends on opinion. The berries cause no real danger for humans, but the plant has an unusual defence mechanism. Its not the berries that's toxic, its the plant itself. Anyone who finds this plant in the wild and simply picked a berry or two would almost certainly die within a day. Fortunately there is an antidote, however unless it's injected into the victims blood stream within minutes of the toxins coming into effect, the chances of surviving are slim.
So, how come this plant is so deadly?
The plant commonly grows in areas where locusts thrive. So this can be almost anywhere really, provided a swarm of locusts go over the area yearly. The plant has microscopic needles that dig in to locusts (any any other insect that cones into contact with the plant), attaching the locust to the plant. If the locusts struggles, it will be torn apart. The plant slowly adsorbs the locust, alive or dead. It then converts its meal to deadly toxins. Little is known about how it does this, but its thought that it has something to do with the protein found in locusts and many other insects. Due to where this plant thrives, it consumes thousands of insects each year. It has storage pockets hidden in its roots, full of poison. Should anything eat the roots, it would die quickly as a pure shock of toxins would be sent straight to its brain, shutting it down. The toxins can be sent to the microscopic needles when needed for defence.
However, ig is argued if its really for defence or not, as none of the victims to this plant actually felt any pain when the toxins entered their body. Surely if this was a defence mechanism, they would have felt pain? Wouldn't the plant want to protect its berries?
It turns out that this plant actually needs the berries to be eaten by a victim, as when it dies, the seed inside can grow in thd corpse. Scavengers only make this process faster, as the toxins hang around for months after death and the scavenger only provides more food for the sapling.