Enfys wrote:@Harpalyce: I shy away from length requirements as well; I feel as if I say "three sentences" that's all anyone gives me. But I also love it here. I think it really connects the community.
@Mao mi: (I apologize in advance if I sound rude in any way. I don't intend it to, really) 1. I think the current way of thinking is too vague. There's a lot of room for improvement in semi-lit. 2) If we don't hang the terms, the definition won't change. If I said pencil meant pony, people would still think of pencil meaning pencil, not pony. 3) Illiterate means you can't read or write, making it inaccurate for our purposes. 4) I wouldn't like being called illiterate, would you?
kuroyami wrote:
but when people "can't take any more nonsense" and "everything is such a slovenly mess", it is only "correct" to call it illiterate. Illiterate, ignorant, foolish, messy, unpolished, uncivilized, inane, immature.
It's is one tiny step above complete lack of education, but the carelessness of it all allows one to safely label "illiterate". text that is hard to understand might as well be(or is it may as well?) be nonsense, and those who care not to read rules, or learn proper mechanics of the language "cannot read".
it is the kindest way to tell someone "you are a blithering idiot", kind like when you put a suffering "dog to sleep"
Enfys wrote:Oh, and also, I was thinking that I should make another topic, this one for debating and improving the idea, the other for being evaluated on your skill level. Spammy? Not spammy? Good idea? Bad?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests