Oshawott8888 wrote:Oshawott8888 wrote:Oshawott8888 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61473041&userid=812658&signature=sQ0JoIScxdvIdCgy7FnCqw
Is this fair ^^?
Oshawott8888 wrote:Oshawott8888 wrote:Oshawott8888 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61473041&userid=812658&signature=sQ0JoIScxdvIdCgy7FnCqw
Is this fair ^^?
Sımpłıcıty wrote:NicoKitten wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61465100&userid=810482&signature=iNs9xt_UZYgJtEjG7gYmGA
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... lJxNiyYbLQ
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... aJWDdZtt8A
Hello!! Which of these is the fairest, and the best bid for my PPS tier 1 Malk?
The third trade. ^^
There are two advents, one tier 7 [True date] and a tier 4.
They're overpaying by a lot.
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:
The first one is unfair to you. If you value an uncommon as two commons, then their 2014 uncommon is only worth a 2013 common. And then, a 2016 very common is worth less than a 2016 uncommon.
For the second one, the pets are within 3 months and are fair swaps. It's just a matter of preference here
Oshawott8888 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61473041&userid=812658&signature=sQ0JoIScxdvIdCgy7FnCqwIs this fair ^^?
Coraychi wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61455396&userid=44074&signature=FU0AbHLqeAArz89YQbkUmg
Is this fair? It's not within the 3-month rule, but I don't know if either of these have demand or anything like that...
☆αℓρнαƒιяєωⓞℓƒ☆ wrote:Coraychi wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=61455396&userid=44074&signature=FU0AbHLqeAArz89YQbkUmg
Is this fair? It's not within the 3-month rule, but I don't know if either of these have demand or anything like that...
Unfair to you both value and demand wise. Malk foxes could go for a bit of overpay while their dog is normal
Users browsing this forum: alesana, Fleckenpferd, King Scotty, MewFuchsia199 and 11 guests