Leurai wrote:UUUUGH. -___- Besides the fact that it's ridiculously unfair, I have 'discontinued items are not for trade' in my rules.
Please read my edited post. Thank you.
seatigeress888 wrote:Rant: Why is 'NEFT' so hard for people to understand? If chickensmoothians want to trade with others, they should at the very least follow the rules!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... ggTDKIrsbg
They had no doubles or trades group, no way I could trade it for something I actually wanted without them yelling at me for being 'unfair'.
TMR wrote:"I have anxiety issues. Because of this, I really don't like one-sided trades. So for your sake and mine, when you send me a trade, offer what you want to offer or ask for what you want because I'm awful at editing."
This was in someones rules. I actually dont get this O.o
[...]
yeah well, i cant really do editing. i think its abrain misfunctn?xD DOn't judge me, the dotcor said it was as serious as BRAIN CANCER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u want me to die?!?!??!?!!?!??!?!?!?!
I. CANT. EDIT. AT. ALL.
if you don't understand, my email is g mail. SO PLEASE??? No editing!!!!!!! dont ask me!!! no 1 sided stuff!!!! i will cancel becuz its easy!!!!!!! im lazy!!!!!
:3
[...]
User wrote:i read your rules but you shouldnt have rules cuz people wont read them but i think this should be good to acept cuz it looks fair tome
dutchgirl8 wrote:Alright, I understand your point, but you have no reason to go and try to stop people having rules. People have rules for reasons, y'know. Because we get rude messages, bad trades and just things we don't want like message-less trades or late commons. Now, please don't moan at me. You dont have to have rules. I just want some for good-trade-risk. And yes, it is fair, but I cancelled because your rudeness. Sorry.
Users browsing this forum: .*Rose*., bunny654, FreddyCenobite, Minimanta, Nicnova, skyrus, Venus Fly and 13 guests