JJdiner wrote:I know it's discontinued but for those of us who still use it is there a way we can get it pinned to the top, just till other lists are made?
JJdiner wrote:I know it's discontinued but for those of us who still use it is there a way we can get it pinned to the top, just till other lists are made?
Anpan wrote:JJdiner wrote:I know it's discontinued but for those of us who still use it is there a way we can get it pinned to the top, just till other lists are made?
Well, then the whole point of it being discontinued would be pointless. They unpinned it because it's not continued anymore.
thejokerkeepsmiling1 wrote:Anpan wrote:JJdiner wrote:I know it's discontinued but for those of us who still use it is there a way we can get it pinned to the top, just till other lists are made?
Well, then the whole point of it being discontinued would be pointless. They unpinned it because it's not continued anymore.
We still have the right to use it...
JJdiner wrote:I know it's discontinued but for those of us who still use it is there a way we can get it pinned to the top, just till other lists are made?
The Gaps List was created in 2013 due to popular demand. It was created originally to show how much each tier was worth and what the gaps were at the time, as it was difficult for many users to determine how different combinations of pets were valued against each other in trades. At first, this was a positive addition as it helped many users to gain a better understanding of the List.
However, this idea also had another problem, one that was foreseen by some of the users who helped to create the Gaps List despite their lingering hesitation. Due to listing pets with pretty precise values, the Gaps List created a orderly structure many users followed to the bone, visible even after the List was retired. It also made pet trading very unrealistic: Due to the rigidity of the Gaps List as well as the actual gaps that it listed (which increased exponentially), the pets on the Rares List ended up having astronomical and unrealistic values.
Another side effect of these unrealistic gaps is that as users went up the Rares List, pet values in terms of pets increased far more rapidly than in terms of C$, according to the C$ values accepted by the community for Rares List pets.
Many CS users who voted to retire the Rares List during the great vote in February 2019 stated in hundreds of posts from pages 450-600 that this was one of many concerns that made the list unable to be reconstructed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests