Restating an older post I made on this topic. Feel free to skip to the bold-text if you already read my previous post.
PinkAngel wrote:
If a player (M2) gets 500C$ from a hacked account (M1).
M2 now has 500C$ of expendable income.
M2 decides to purchase a 500C$ pet from M3.
This leaves M1 at 0C$
This leaves M2 at 0C$ + pet.
This leaves M3 at 500C$
The trade is reversed between M1 and M2.
M2 does not have 500C$, so ChickenSmoothie pays M1 the 500C$ on M2’s behalf.
This leaves M1 at 500C$
This leaves M2 at 0C$ + Pet
This leaves M3 at 500C$
This leaves ChickenSmoothie at -500C$
Because ChickenSmoothie generated 500C$, someone has to eat the cost, therefore puts the debt onto M2.
This leaves M1 at 500C$
This leaves M2 at -500C$ + Pet
This leaves M3 at 500C$
This leaves ChickenSmoothie at 0C$
M2 reaches out to ChickenSmoothie about their debt (through ticket). Chicken smoothie says that they will convert that pet into 500C$ M2 agrees and that pet is turned into 500C$ which will bring the -500C$ to 0C$
So now;
This leaves M1 at 500C$
This leaves M2 at 0C$
This leaves M3 at 500C$
This leaves ChickenSmoothie at 0C$
(with the pet no longer existing?)
Is that the gist of players fixing their debt? Does any item/pet they received through spending C$ get converted into what they paid? What if the player gifted some of the C$ away? Will they be required to give up pets/items they had always owned/obtained rightfully?
(I am not saying that ChickenSmoothie is requiring players to convert the pets/items into C$ to get out of debt. Since I am unsure what conversations or alternatives are being offered to members who are reaching out through tickets. I can only speculate)