Tae wrote:Ikaaaaaaaaa wrote:I've changed my mind, I'm keeping #24. No one may apply for him anymore, and anyone who's received permission, well I take it back. Sorry about that D:
lirrie, your theory doesn't hold up, I'm sorry :/ It's as easy as checking someone's old posts, seeing what smilies they like using/how they type, then using the quote coding. Anyone could be fooled by the above, even thought I only did what I just mentioned.
wibeke wrote:I support the idea of screen shots, but they can also be easily faked. A lot of people crop out the layout in the back and just leave the words. I think the whole screen shot should be there.
Even a whole screenshot can be faked, though. I took a totally different PM, and by copying and pasting some things from the user's post and retyping things in as close to the font as I could get, I made
this.There's probably a few small errors, but would anyone think right away that this was faked? Unless you knew it already, most would probably be fooled by that. And I could make it even more realistic if I wanted to; if I did get a reply from the donator saying I couldn't have it, I could PM myself a message saying I could and just copy and paste the acception message over the rejection. Even someone with just paint could do that if they thought of it. The only thing I can think of that can't be faked is if the donator posts here giving their permission.
...but I doubt anyone would really put that much thought into faking it. X3