Discussion about Re-release system. Why just rares?

[Ashki]

Aside from the problems presented with the amount of disappointment it would cause, there's also the fact to consider that the only reason these pets are still uncommon and haven't changed to rare is because there's enough of them on active accounts. In that way it's kind of self-regulating: when there aren't enough of them any more, they'll turn rare and will be added to the 18th box in their turn.

Came here to post this as well - I think the release should stay rare+. ^^ I don't see any problems with the rerelease as it is now, and I think adding uncommons would just cause a lot of disappointment.

[Lufi]

Aside from the problems presented with the amount of disappointment it would cause, there's also the fact to consider that the only reason these pets are still uncommon and haven't changed to rare is because there's enough of them on active accounts. In that way it's kind of self-regulating: when there aren't enough of them any more, they'll turn rare and will be added to the 18th box in their turn.

Came here to post this as well - I think the release should stay rare+. ^^ I don't see any problems with the rerelease as it is now, and I think adding uncommons would just cause a lot of disappointment.

Yeah I really understand that... I not remembered that was once re-released commons back in times and that it made a lot of members sad... its probably reason why was did re-released again in 24th then...
I really wouldn't want to make anybody sad that they got just uncommon... I only thought that some old (2009-2010) could get chance in re-released too... but I just not thought about it too much as I had ^^'

[nickjr]

I could see lil rascal's suggestion working (separate box for the uncommons), but only if the number of different uncommons rereleased is high enough, even if the limit is 1