Sinbreaker wrote:Nicole wrote:leru wrote:We could all try and work together on a new rarity only list? Since there's been no updates on the one that was in progress.
We can do a google doc, so we can all edit and collaborate on it too.
Like you said, Sinbreaker, the new players are just being thrown straight into a fire.
yes, I think that would be a good idea. I would love to work on a new list through docs.
There were a lot of threads and spreadsheets created with a lot of pet data, through it we discovered things we didn't know about pets, for instance we discovered that Green Toxics were appearing a lot less then its littermates yet it sat at the bottom of the littermate ladder.
Yet I don't know what happened to these list. The community stopped working on them. I want to know why. Did we give up? Did the players who were running the threads decide it wasn't worth working on anymore?
Crestalia wrote:It's very possible they come up with their own trading list and use that. Everyone is allowed to value their pets how they want to, right? The stats list can be continued to be worked on while users coming up with their own trading guides and lists. That's how this list came about, believe it or not! The first edition was just a bunch of users values crammed into one list!
I never said that the May Lioness had to be added by the way. Just that we should look at some trades. I haven't seen any ridiculous overpay trades for the May Lioness, literally ever. I've seen people ask an 09 rare or two but it is a 2010 very rare after all.
Sinbreaker wrote:But it's not just the store pets who are being affected.
I saw a post on tumblr the other day that said something along the lines of "A Non-Dog isn't even worth a Non" And its sad because it's true. List trading is falling apart because of demand, but not just because of the store pets. The other list pets who have earned their placement are being deemed "unpopular" and therefore "not worth much". I'm not talking about Grinners, Pink Septembers, Green Toxic or fruit. Things that have had struggling demand for years. I'm talking about the dogs on the seventh tier, the 09 UR dog, the Non Dogs, the Sorbets. The things that have had stable demand for such a long time but now are only stepping stones for fodder in getting the store pets and high demand list.
It's falling apart and a reform needs to come quickly or else the economy- no the game is going to fall apart. The Rare's List needs update more than it needs add ons and additions. It needs to address these concerns quickly before all the older players either side with "not worth fixing, I got my collection" and "might as well quit."
We can't leave CS in this state for the newbies that are flooding in. It won't be fun for them, CS won't be fun for anyone. Everyone should have the chance to reach their dream pet without having to give up their entire collection for one animal.
she/her | ace ♠️
Need to vent?
Want help?
My PMs are open!
Looking for Art
Barn + Stables
Mozzy. wrote:my turn
Yes - one day the Store pets will become rarer than normal pets because they had a limited release, but that doesn't warrant the prices they're going for now. While I agree that certain Store pets should be on the List for rarity reasons, people seem to take the fact they're on the List and demand more and more and more. You can't do a fair trade for even the lowest ranked Store pets, such as the Basilisk Litter. Trust me - I've tried. I either get a rude message back because "it's not worth that it's worth more" or no message at all. The Store Horses are worse still, everyone wants them and is demanding / paying much more than they're worth.
For hoarder and richer players - yes I'm going to use the word rich because frankly, it's true - it's easy to pay the demands (or even make them if you're one of those players and buys low and sells high). But they're just fueling the fire. Poorer players and newbies have little to no hope of even getting their foot in the door for List trading unless they're happy to settle on the ones that the makers of the Rares List said were 'not worth their place' or 'worth nothing at all'.
It's taken me years to trade off my Palomino Tess Horse, simply because people won't trade fair or even a slight underpay for it. Because someone once said 'it's not worth that'.
-snip-
SpyroMello wrote:Regarding the "New" List Discussion:
I believe CS stated somewhere on the site that they're going to work with users to create a "List" a giant compiled one not split up into 3, and have that one be the official "List." So before some of you jump into the work and labor of making a new one, consider this. CS staff is understanding how important the Lists are and how it helps with fair trading. We've all gone by these "Lists" for years and almost the entire site goes by it. If a small group of you creates a new one, it will not only mess up everyone's sight on value of specific pets, but it'll confuse them. We are a small voice of a big community. That's why we have this thread on CS. So anyone can come and voice their opinion. If we have another discussion off site that gets buried in these pages, no one will know. There will be threads and users who go by the "Old List" and the "New List" and it'll make trading more difficult. I'd suggest trying to work it out here before starting clean and creating an entirely new "List."
-snip-
Users browsing this forum: Nhotemau, Riley, Scarlet Janefox and 2 guests