CaninePC wrote:-snip-
Or what about Accounts having set limits for VR + pets that can be adopted? Maybe monthly? Like:
This account has: 1 slot to snatch a Store/OMGsR, 2 Extremely rares, 5VRs and the rest (rare and lower) have no set limit.
It would then really limit the high value pets from being drained too fast from the pound!
Well that's the idea in an easy to code world xD!! Sorry for the long rambling. Tablet isn't great at editing
CaninePC wrote:
I almost wished that when it came to store pets being found in the pound rather move these to a Dec 18th type give away rather than the pound itself.
Or maybe put a code on the account that nabbed one that then limits them for like 3 + months from nabbing any other store, OMGsR, or extremely rare pet. Only so that they can't be one of those with fast internet and processing speeds to keep taking more.
I'm on a 5 year old tablet. My speed isn't great so of course anything really great is almost automatically out of my grasp.
Doing it like they do the Dec 18th pets for sure to me gives a better random chance of getting something nice vs knowing you wont. And it can be said on the pound: 'any pet found to be VR + automatically gets moved into there.'
And yes I've gotten a lot of rare-vr rats from Dec 18th :lol: !
:idea: Or what about Accounts having set limits for VR + pets that can be adopted? Maybe monthly? Like:
This account has: 1 slot to snatch a Store/OMGsR, 2 Extremely rares, 5VRs and the rest (rare and lower) have no set limit.
It would then really limit the high value pets from being drained too fast from the pound!
Well that's the idea in an easy to code world xD!! Sorry for the long rambling. Tablet isn't great at editing :?
rats! wrote:Mirenoch wrote:rats! wrote:I think we should get rid of the pound
Genuinely want to hear more about this..
delete pound 👍
Lemon Bark wrote:Staff, can we get more posts/polls on different ideas for the pound? It seems like this thread has deviated pretty far from the question asked and more threads might be helpful for keeping posts on subject.
Darkcloud! wrote:Why do people keep insisting that users are saying they are "owed rares" when the actual posts from other users are about the chance to click on one/see one at all on their page over the course of a pound open, and the disparity between those who have the means for faster internet connection, spare time, and a desktop computer and those who don't, and how it could be addressed.
Genuinely curious as to why the words keep getting turned into trying to make users sound ungrateful and demanding and to dismiss the valid concerns of people brought up around this just being a band-aid on the wider issue of openings that disproportionately distribute pets.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests