nickjr wrote:Shian's post had me thinking...
Maybe we should just split every single rarity. Double the number of rarity tags. Considering we went from 300 pets and 6 tags to 3000 pets and 7 tags to... now 8000 pets and still 7 tags, I have to say that 8000 pets and 14 tags doesn't sound too unreasonable. It only sounds bad if you say "14 tags" all by itself because we're so used to just 7 tags.
(But have the thresholds for every two levels stay the same; basically, imagine each tag as a "parent" tag giving birth to two "children" tags, where each parent covers the same range as both of its children)
Maybe that should be a separate suggestion. idk
I actually really like this idea. I have no idea how much work this would be to actually implement, but I think this evens things out just a bit, rather than having all of this new confusion landing squarely on the new VR/'New Unnamed Rarity'.