Idea to add another rarity between VR & OMGSR? (Poll added)

[SabrinaB]

I dont really see the need of adding an extra tag in the common section, since those gaps are tiny. The pets dont have a big value when trading. If you trade for 3 2020 rares, 1 vc or c doesnt make any diffrence. It would only add tiers to gaps that are already small.

However, i'd love to see an extra tag in the rare section. On the discussion thread people talked about ultra rare (UR) but this would conflict with unreleased (also UR) so seeing extra rare makes me happy!
The gap between a vr store pet and the very rare joker is huge!
There is a lot of guessing and demand when the rarest pets were added to the list. I remember people saying "the august pps isnt rare enough to be on the list" but how do we know? "I see it everywhere" duh! It was new and demand was through the roof! Ofcourse people were trading when people offered septemberlist or main list for it! But there is no way to see how rare a pet really is whlithout counting every pet and excluding inactive accounts (but how long does it have to be inactive not to count as active amymore?)

A new rarity might make things more clear!
Big support

[onion]

MEGA SUPPORT LETS BRING THIS BACK YALL

[almondkitty]

Supporting because I suggested something similar in another topic, though that suggestion was for two more rarities. Adding one between R and VR pets and then one between VR and OMGSR, since I feel there are weird large gaps between both pairs of rarities.

totally agree, the gap between R & VR is too large for there to not be a category between the two, likewise with VR & OMGSR

[ShadowKatto]

Support, let’s revive this thing!

[Yaeli]

I believe the consensus is currently:

OMGSR > ER (extra rare) > VR > R > UC > C > VC > EC (extra common) > OMGSC

Now some people think that EC (extra common) isn't necessary, and I agree, but if it was added, we could shift the entire spectrum up, further helping the rare side of things be differentiated!

[twilispark]

supporting this 7 year old suggestion (:

[sxtxrn]

dont support

at this point in the game i think a new rarity would cause way more confusion than you think it would.
as someone who was here during the rarity update & doing away with of the rares list: a new rarity has the potential of messing up the economy even worse for awhile
not only would staff have to singlehandedly reexamine the rarities of every single pet on the site, but users would have to reconstruct the rares list AGAIN.
this idea would have been amazing to implement in the early days of cs but i think we are way too far in the lifespan to effectively implement this without pushing even more users away.
as is the current rares list takes a lot of effort to digest and comfortably understand. by adding a new rarity we could completely destroy that and a lot of users just dont have the time to relearn something like that anymore.
plus as someone previously mentioned it would through off our even balance of rarities

great idea but wrong time unfortunately:(

[LokisTrick]

Supporting this ^^

[libra_rae]

supporting this!

[Lex.]

support