OutFoxed wrote:Registered Name: Fortitude FSBreed of Registration: Irish Sport Horse
Breed of approval: Sport Horse
Brand?: No
Fortitude FS was successfully registered as an Irish Sport Horse.
Fortitude FS was successfully approved for Sport Horse.
OutFoxed wrote:Registered Name: Kiss & Tell FSBreed of Registration: Selle Français
Breed(s) of approval: American Warmblood, Oldenburg, Gelderlander, Holsteiner, and Knabstrupper
Brand?: No
Kiss & Tell FS was successfully registered as Selle Français.
Kiss & Tell FS was successfully approved for American Warmblood, Oldenburg, and Gelderlander.
Kiss & Tell FS was not approved for Holsteiner or Knabstrupper as she does not have documented Holsteiner or Knabstrupper blood.
OutFoxed wrote:Registered Name: Dancing Wildfire FSBreed of Registration: American Warmblood
Breed(s) of approval: Trakehner and Rhinelander
Brand?: No
Dancing Wildfire FS was successfully registered as American Warmblood.
Dancing Wildfire FS was successfully approved for Rhinelander.
Dancing Wildfire FS was not successfully approved for Trakehner as she does not have documented Trakehner blood.
OutFoxed wrote:Additional Notes: Would adding Canadian and/or British Warmblood be beneficial in anyway? Or would they be treated similarly to the American Warmblood?[/size][/list]
That's a fantastic idea! I'd have to look up the breed standards to see how they would be registered and such, but I could certainly see those being valuable additions!
Additionally, as a general note, I am strongly considering doing away with breed approvals. As such, a horse would only be registered for one breed, but could continue to produce Warmbloods of other registries if the foals qualified for that registry. Hopefully this would make the registration process go a whole lot more smoothly and slim down the registry as a whole. What do you guys think? Yay or nay?