☾ИιɢнтƆℓαи Ѵ.6 ||N̲o̲t̲ A̲c̲c̲e̲p̲t̲i̲n̲g̲||☽

[r e d.]

I agree with that!
but I kinda do think what
we agreed on with Cass
earlier is better, since people
may still want new cats.

[storm coming.]

Alright here is a proposal...
Everyone can keep their cats, but for every month they can only make one new one (including kits), and it will not rollover to the next month as well, so let's say you start in january and make 12 new cats in december. That is not allowed. You simply get one every month if you wish to make one, if not, forever hold your peace.

You were part of the discussion, but you just forgot.

[fish out of water]

Alright here is a proposal...
Everyone can keep their cats, but for every month they can only make one new one (including kits), and it will not rollover to the next month as well, so let's say you start in january and make 12 new cats in december. That is not allowed. You simply get one every month if you wish to make one, if not, forever hold your peace.

You were part of the discussion, but you just forgot.

We never had a legitimate vote on it and we had desired other options prior to it.

I agree with that proposition, where you get eight to start off with and if you choose to make other cats you become 'in debt' for those coming months where you do not get to make any cats until your 'debt' is payed off.

[r e d.]

would you be happy if everyone didn't get
their way but you did? majority agreed with
the new rule, majority rules out. only a couple
of people disagreed. let's just go with case's
rule and end this, shall we?

I don't like fighting when it is one person
causing the chaos, but it needs to end,

[fish out of water]

would you be happy if everyone didn't get
their way but you did? majority agreed with
the new rule, majority rules out. only a couple
of people disagreed. let's just go with case's
rule and end this, shall we?

I don't like fighting when it is one person
causing the chaos, but it needs to end,

Calm down.
I am saying that we never had a vote on it, so how is it fair?
Not everyone got to vote, obviously. So we should not carry out with it.
Not only this, but it sounds like we agreed on two different things, that those who have been around longer were allowed to keep those cats they have always kept instead of throwing them out like trash.
We had all agreed earlier that this would be fair, and so I had counted on it.
However, it sounds like somewhere in between we chose another option, which never had an official vote.

You don't need to rip on me like this
I understand that I may have come off as rude but I'm just trying to protect my rights to keep my cats as I had believed all along.
Had I known back in volume one and two that I would be limited down to right now, I never would have made so many cats
But because I can't see into the future, I made more cats. This is unfair to those who have been around longer.
The only reason why I am so defensive on this topic is that I have strong emotional bonds with my cats.
Giving them up and killing them off is like killing family to me,
A lot of these cats have had relationships, friendships, and are family to spirits cats.
Killing them is killing my relationships with her.

I am fine with the rule that as the months go on we can have a debt system.
But I don't want to kill and destroy my cats just to uphold to some stupid rule.

[Esther~]

I want to keep 5 toms and 1 she-cat,but the rule sais even genders. I don't know what to do ))

I just realized that since Clearsky's owner hasn't posted for such a long time she might be counted as dead. I feel so bad because Patchstep loved her a lot. Hes going to be so upset ;-; ))

[r e d.]

I'm able to make a cat for Patchstep <3
I understand it won't be the same,
but feel free to pm me if you are
interested c:

[ShadowOfTheBird]

*Trembling in corner*
Uhuhuhuhuhuhuh I hate misunderstandings. But uh...for my two cents, I like the debt thing, and I also like the new cat every month thing...

I feel you though Blizzard, my ratio used to be way out of whack XD I think it's mostly evened out now though. Hopefully.

[C a s]

would you be happy if everyone didn't get
their way but you did? majority agreed with
the new rule, majority rules out. only a couple
of people disagreed. let's just go with case's
rule and end this, shall we?

I don't like fighting when it is one person
causing the chaos, but it needs to end,

Calm down.
I am saying that we never had a vote on it, so how is it fair?
Not everyone got to vote, obviously. So we should not carry out with it.
Not only this, but it sounds like we agreed on two different things, that those who have been around longer were allowed to keep those cats they have always kept instead of throwing them out like trash.
We had all agreed earlier that this would be fair, and so I had counted on it.
However, it sounds like somewhere in between we chose another option, which never had an official vote.

You don't need to rip on me like this
I understand that I may have come off as rude but I'm just trying to protect my rights to keep my cats as I had believed all along.
Had I known back in volume one and two that I would be limited down to right now, I never would have made so many cats
But because I can't see into the future, I made more cats. This is unfair to those who have been around longer.
The only reason why I am so defensive on this topic is that I have strong emotional bonds with my cats.
Giving them up and killing them off is like killing family to me,
A lot of these cats have had relationships, friendships, and are family to spirits cats.
Killing them is killing my relationships with her.

I am fine with the rule that as the months go on we can have a debt system.
But I don't want to kill and destroy my cats just to uphold to some stupid rule.

wooooah bear, way outta line there. fish is co-owner therefore has authority, so that post was quite disrespectful and honestly just rude.

We had previously agreed on that, and when I addressed the issue again I am fairly certain you guys all agreed on it, including you fish, but the debt thing works for me.

Honestly though it's p absurd to keep a ton of cats just for the sake of sentiment because we're going to end up with 100+ cats again which is a ridiculous amount.
I think we should, if it becomes a problem, put a ban on making new characters until the numbers thin out a bit.

Like, I understand the sentiment. I've invested a looooot of time and thought on these characters. A ton. But, we can't just keep 20 cats per person because we refuse to let the go simply due to attachment.

[trees |-/]

i agree with cas, keep the ones your actually going to use