Things that annoy you.

[Missy]

I only joined in march and I have pets from july all the way up to right this month. I didn't make an account because somebody had used my email *grrrr* and I had to wait for a while until I got a new one.

[qhost]

I'd just like to point a few things out:

• For those of you who think I'm greedy, I'd like to say once again that I'd get nothing out of this. I'm trying to help out newer members, and I'd get none of the accountless pets either way.
• I don't think it's unfair, just annoying, and pointless if the owner doesn't even want them.
• I understand that some people are still trying to get older rares, but if we had more rares now, we could use them to get the older ones and/or other pets you want.
• For the last time, why are we still talking about accountless pets?

[Sorren Fey]

Well, you've started the discussion about accountless pets and you can't just say 'Stop it!', because almost everybody is against your opinion.

And once again: It is unfair to take accountless pets.
Those people may use them as site mascots or whatever. And now think about the username on the image would suddenly change... How would you feel?

And since we do offer adopting without account, it will never happen that those pets will go to the pound.

And just think about how much time that would require.

NO-GO.

And besides, that is how the game works... You have to be on the right place to the right time. If not, you have to work for the past pets.
It will never be possible that everybody can have a complete collection. The more time goes by the more unlikely it will be.
What is in five years? Shall we rerelease old pets because the poor newbies wouldn't have a chance to get them otherwise?
But then the older members will yell at us, because the pets will become worthless.

[qhost]

Well, you've started the discussion about accountless pets and you can't just say 'Stop it!', because almost everybody is against your opinion.

Not meaning to start another argument or anything, but I never started the discussion about accountless pets. This thread was to discuss anything that you find annoying. The accountless pets thing was just an example as I couldn't think of anything else at the time, as it clearly says in the first post.

And since we do offer adopting without account, it will never happen that those pets will go to the pound.

This wasn't a suggestion, as I said before. It's just my opinion. This is in CS Chat, not Suggestions, and if having your own opinion isn't allowed, then why not ban discussion of favourite books or movies? This is exactly the same thing as any of that, but people aren't going to turn around and start saying that people who like Warriors are stupid and that it's unfair. It just seems that these days you can't express your opinion about anything and not have to worry about people arguing about it.

I'm going to edit the first post so that it's more obvious to people. It seems like everyone only reads half the message, then ignores the rest.

[Shian]

Well, you've started the discussion about accountless pets and you can't just say 'Stop it!', because almost everybody is against your opinion.

Not meaning to start another argument or anything, but I never started the discussion about accountless pets. This thread was to discuss anything that you find annoying. The accountless pets thing was just an example as I couldn't think of anything else at the time, as it clearly says in the first post.

I'm going to edit the first post so that it's more obvious to people. It seems like everyone only reads half the message, then ignores the rest.

No, it didn't clearly say that.

"This is to post things that annoy you! Here is what annoys me:"

The original post was just the tirade on accountless pets. People discussed it for over FOUR PAGES because that's what we thought it was about. You even joined the discussion twice instead of coming in and clarifying, "Hey, this is to just post what annoys you, so post what annoys you, not discuss what annoys me"

So, yes you can't just start up this discussion and say "Oh, stop it." and pretend you never meant to discuss this in the first place just because no one agrees with you.

Not only that, but on the second page you said this,

Okay, to get this straight, this isn't a complaint thread.

So, make up your mind?

[EsperEverAfter]

"I don't think it's unfair, just annoying, and pointless if the owner doesn't even want them."

How do you know the owner doesn't want them? What makes you so certain that the owner isn't posting those pets somewhere?

[Mausoleum]

What I think is that we should drop the subject. These pets are owned by someone, whether they still play or not, it's not our call to decide. Unless they issue a written statement, in legal terms it still belongs to them.

.... Let's change the subject.

EDIT: How does everyone feel about the people whose first post on the forums was their moderator application? I was thinking of going round today and PMing everyone who applied with less that 9 posts, advising them to go RP for a bit.

[Sorren Fey]

Eh, rosey... Save your time...
Those won't get the job nevertheless.

If they would read what Tess has written, they wouldn't have applied.

[Shian]

Eh, rosey... Save your time...
Those won't get the job nevertheless.

If they would read what Tess has written, they wouldn't have applied.

*chuckles* Maybe Tess bolded the wrong sections.

Reading some of them, I'm thinking a basic grasp of spelling would do them some good too.
It's good that so many people are willing to help though. CS has many multiple of new members. I'm surprised we didn't get more mods sooner.

[Sorren Fey]

And punctuation... <_<;

It wasn't that hard to manage all the new members... But especially in the last few weeks the art thieves had a big 'boom'. I wonder where they all come from.
And the more members we have the more brazen they are. XD