wolves - your opinon?

[Stormwarning12]

If there were no wolves like Ninten said then the world would B chaos, we do need wolves and yes they are not the only provider but do provide so much for tourism, keeping prey healthy (by weeding out the sick) and keeping the prey populations down NATURALLY!

Replying to Ninten on pge 36

[Stormwarning12]

Thank u. Bye 4 now.

[Bolt1784]

If there were no wolves like Ninten said then the world would B chaos,

No, you C, we're not saying to kill all wolves. Of course ecosystems need wolves.
But they need to be controlled like any other population because of the risks they
pose to us and other species.

[The Winter Soldier]

Controlled hunting and poaching are not the same thing. A controlled hunt only helps keep populations stable and helps yhe ecosystem by not allowing too many of an animal to exist. The more predators you have in an area the more likely they are to decimate the prey animals they eat. A balance must exist snd because there aren't alot of things to keep the populations low naturally for some wolf species humans do sometimes have to step in and hunt a certain number. It is this way with white tailed deer in the us there are too many so they have hunting seasons.

[Bolt1784]

f the wolves are overpopulated they then starve and die out, and the prey population grows back, then it all happens again

That's what happened with one ecosystem - except the balance just kept messing up repeatedly.
Look up Isle Royale.

[The Winter Soldier]

I said hunting can help never said anything about controlling every parr of it that isn"t even feasible.

You seem to have a habit of calling people like me idiotic and obnoxious and i for one never called you that so why don't you realize that in some cases hunting can help but not always

Instead of being rude about it and calling people with mt beliefs an obnoxious idiot.

[PeachFuzz]

@The Winter Soldier
It is quite bothersome to go to reply to one of your posts and see you've deleted it. Then you make a new post then you delete that to... It's extremely difficult to have a debate with you doing that.

[Bolt1784]

The only instance is where we've messed up the eco-system in the first place (take the introduction of the grey squirrel in Britain, for example) and need to fix our mistakes.

Yeah, that's kind of the point. In some places there are invasive species that shouldn't be there.

[Angelus Gaston]

I was thinking the same thing three times I tried to reply and post's were gone.

Anyway.
Sheba.
Hunting does benefit both predators and prey as it gets rid of unneeded animals preventing starvation and the spread of dieses which in most cases can wipe out a population in the most horrible of ways.

Yes it means we have to step but would you sooner hunters kill animal quickly or leave it to starve which is a horrible way to go.

[Wolf & Crow]

Guys what's the point of arguing, everybody has a different opinion and you can't change that, we never actually get to a point and we just keep on repeating the same things, some people (Me included) think that hunting any kind of animals is wrong even if it's only to keep control of the number of them as Shebawolf said I think that could happen naturally, but other people don't and I respect that but doing an argument was not the point of this forum, you have to give your opinion about wolves and we've gone off topic for quite a lot of time. I respect both options not meaning that I aprove them but still I won't tell the others that don't think like me that they are wrong.