oh no, nevermind then ^^ Its fine
Flyn & Risu wrote:We could -on top of Asian's idea and other Smamm-approved suggestions- impliment a one year rule. If you haven't posted for a year, then you have to reapply. Just this time, because if standards going up. A more illiterate person could be on the list from a year ago but never posted since, it would be fair to have them reapply. c:
rohirrim. wrote:Flyn & Risu wrote:We could -on top of Asian's idea and other Smamm-approved suggestions- impliment a one year rule. If you haven't posted for a year, then you have to reapply. Just this time, because if standards going up. A more illiterate person could be on the list from a year ago but never posted since, it would be fair to have them reapply. c:
i really like this. should members be notified they're going to be removed from the list if they haven't posted
Ɔᴇʀᴛᴀɪɴ Ɖᴀʀᴋ Ƭʜɪɴɢs wrote:There's also people who stalk us and don't post because we scare them, and they've applied and been accepted..
I agree with Angel. What's it even matter if there is inactive members on the list? you're going to end up with inactive members no matter what you do...
personally I feel like we're just making it an even more exclusive club, which is only going to end up scaring more people away
city; wrote:
I just really wanna know why we're scary. :{
Users browsing this forum: AustrianAce and 0 guests