lunamoth19 wrote:Solanum wrote:Lady Sif wrote:Just a suggestion for next year's SS, maybe have tiers like Plumies does, so people get grouped with other people who plan on doing the same amount of work. Because the current values are pretty vague.
It's an idea but I don't think it's really a solution... Because what if something happens and you then can't meet that extended minimum?
What if you have less time than you thought, or you struggle to get art of their characters? Plus it's additional pressure on the individual.
I'm just saying, it seems like it could have more problems to it than everyone is looking at.
Snip
I'm sorry but isn't the idea of SS to gift others? Doing a tier system would make it more about receiving. And some people who join in do their very best and that should be respected instead of tiering it as not good enough. That and part of SS is the surprise. You don't know if you have that legendary artist or not as your SS. If you teir things you take away that surprise and those people who arnt the richest or best at art will never get that shot at art from say Talonex or Sadbloom or serbronn ect. It's not about the quality or number of art you receive but instead it's about making someone elses holiday special. Tiering it will make it so that the people with the most resources will get SSes that they could aford to trade or buy art from any day of the year
The tier system has worked so far for other people as far as I've seen. The one I'm basing it on is the Plumie SS that I'm doing.
The ranges would be pretty wide, so that people would be able to have a good idea of what they can do, so even if they can't do as much as they would like, they could still fit the range. You could also have more time then you thought and go past the range limit, it wouldn't move you up a tier or anything, you'd just be going way over the top and being nice.
Nobody would be tiered as "not good enough", tiering would only effect the amount of art you get or give. It wouldn't take away the surprise of anything, you'd just be able to know that you're going to be getting the same amount of effort you put in.
I know everyone is saying "It's about giving, not receiving", but I don't think that it's fair that some people end up giving 10-20 pieces and getting bare minimum work in return.
Removed.
Doesn't it make more sense for people who plan on doing a ton of work also having a ton of work done for them? Because I feel like that would be a better idea then someone doing a ton of work and getting the smallest amount of work possible in return.
I have removed my piece on how I felt, but I would like to state I personally will not be doing SS next year and I do not plan on staying with CAAA either.