The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[myth;]

HEELPP
Raven + ? + Joker = Dogtag?

Valuing joker and rawen both at a non, you gotta add another non.. tho i did hear the demand of the raven went down and some value it at a sorbet..??!

The ravens demand has always been from a sorbet to a non, but greedy players constantly try to boost it up to a non.

So really, depending on how the owner or the dog tag values things, they need to add anything between 1 or 2 nons.

[soupy.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67189423&userid=814854&signature=QgGiRWxeg4CPPOAT4el5lQ
Would this be fair? If not, what would they need to add?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67189546&userid=814854&signature=QYOMgeisFp2N8OGX4YjNjA
Which one is better?

I got one reply but I'd like another one or two just to be one hundred percent sure...

[myth;]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67189423&userid=814854&signature=QgGiRWxeg4CPPOAT4el5lQ
Would this be fair? If not, what would they need to add?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67189546&userid=814854&signature=QYOMgeisFp2N8OGX4YjNjA
Which one is better?

The first one is much better as the C$ value at a CEG, which is sometimes traded for a non, which is what the butterfly wolf trades for on average. But it is worth 1615C$ as written on the thread, so they'd either need to add something that bridges the gap between the CEG and the Butterfly wolf (2 nons depending on personal player demand), or another 800C$.

[sorashinny]

is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... YAeQ5-t5Ow

[myth;]

is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... YAeQ5-t5Ow

Not in the slightest.
The zebra alone is an overpay for the PPS, and though both have bad demand and fetch a non or two each, the UR aussie is worth a non and a sorbet and has good demand. You'd be better off with a zebra (worth 3 nons+) than the PPS (worth 2 nons+), in my opinion.

[soupy.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67190332&userid=814854&signature=xlS2GlmO6M71NXXTHmJ3VA
They/We edited it. How is it now? What else should be added if it still currently isn't fair?

[WolfwithWings38]

is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... YAeQ5-t5Ow

Not in the slightest.
The zebra alone is an overpay for the PPS, and though both have bad demand and fetch a non or two each, the UR aussie is worth a non and a sorbet and has good demand. You'd be better off with a zebra (worth 3 nons+) than the PPS (worth 2 nons+), in my opinion.

I definitely agree because that's SO unfair!

[it depends]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 49G3AiCvzw

this?
(really tempted)

[lady gaga]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=67190407&userid=892290&signature=7LRDpcmrG5Kj49G3AiCvzw

this?
(really tempted)

dont, your dog is originally from 2008 and you could get that + 2 '09 rares for it

[holodog]

Item(total 603) + advent list trade
I'm not 100% confident in my judgement of item worth in C$/pets but this is basically just a "rough draft" trade, so what would need to be added to either side to make this fair?