The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[SpikedKanine]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=97480289&userid=694743&signature=TaMwj_gbeybPrmS2IY3KBA Is this a fair trade? All of the pets they offered to me were on my wishlist, and it's for the banana which I think is one of the rarest pets on the website? 👀

This is absolutely unfair. The banana from what I’ve seen goes for 1 non which is worth 100-150 ‘09 Rares (from a guide I’m looking at). This is worth no where near that

If by some chance I am incorrect someone correct me. From what I can see, I don’t think any of these pets have any special demand that make them even close to a non worth

What about this trade? trades/viewtrade.php?id=97512904&userid=694743&signature=suvKerfKyGXwGUcoTOKuew

The amount of chicken dollars they want to give me I think makes it a fair trade but I'm still unsure.

[0000]

could someone please help me with this
trades/viewtrade.php?id=97509025&userid=1009731&signature=gtyKdJkEaoe0_5PLdjbb4Q

[ShinyUmbreon13]

I really can’t believe this would be fair?? i know it has some worth but equal to the skelebun?

This as well?

I’m the one offering on the kitsune trade (second one), I’d also like to know if it is fair or not, and if I need to add at all, how much I’d need to add

The first trade (containing the garland) is unfair.
The garland would go for an aug-sept 2008 pet, according to this thread: Forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=559754#p12840689, so it's a massive underpay

unfortunately, i'm not too sure about the items from the second trade. however, with only the pets, it's an undertrade as well, the kitsune set trades for about 5-6 mas, at the very least. their side seems to contain about 2-3 mas (only containing the pets). Not sure about the items, but pretty sure it won't add up to 3 mas.

I thought singular kitsunes only went for 1.5 MAs, 2 at very most. That’s what I saw multiple times and was told a lot as well

[Taf900]

thoughts on this?

a bunch of store pets for flamingo

[N1C0T1N3]

snip
This as well?[/quote]

I’m the one offering on the kitsune trade (second one), I’d also like to know if it is fair or not, and if I need to add at all, how much I’d need to add[/quote]
The first trade (containing the garland) is unfair.
The garland would go for an aug-sept 2008 pet, according to this thread: Forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=559754#p12840689, so it's a massive underpay

unfortunately, i'm not too sure about the items from the second trade. however, with only the pets, it's an undertrade as well, the kitsune set trades for about 5-6 mas, at the very least. their side seems to contain about 2-3 mas (only containing the pets). Not sure about the items, but pretty sure it won't add up to 3 mas.[/quote]

I thought singular kitsunes only went for 1.5 MAs, 2 at very most. That’s what I saw multiple times and was told a lot as well[/quote]

yes, I agree, kitsunes are worth 1.5-2 MA depending on the person, this seems like a fair trade I'm not too sure about the red and black VR, just going to assume its 2 09 rares as I dont think its too special, I'm not sure about the items, correct me if I'm wrong

[Miladux]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=97514163&userid=402566&signature=qXlLA1T24ah8qKquOQnnAQ

im not great with large list trades :,O

[Somniferum]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=97514287&userid=512242&signature=5QM1lQtLPzUFlj2J0qFVmg

I don't know much about item worth, is this fair?

[N1C0T1N3]

could someone please help me with this
trades/viewtrade.php?id=97509025&userid=1009731&signature=gtyKdJkEaoe0_5PLdjbb4Q

this is unfair to you by at least 2 090rares and then some for the griffin pet on your wide, their Dino store pet is only worth 1 09 rare, this is very unfair to you

[Tawny-]

Any idea on the balance of this trade for the nick fox? I'm interested in the bulk since it helps fill my wishlist, just not sure if there's particular demand for this fella!

Still hoping for advice ♡

Advice would be appreciated

[*Nevi Nova*]

is this a fair trade? trades/viewtrade.php?id=97514357&userid=474705&signature=sz1hpjJPvuUrOcoKDvEfOg im not sure on the C$ value on items