musicgurl333 wrote:RedAutumnLeaf wrote:Zelda_the_Wolf wrote:No it's not. It's unfair to her. (Bottom side)
2 2010 uncommons are equal to a 2010 rare. The extra pets are uneeded...Actually, I believe 4 2010 uncommons equal a 2010 rare. Is that not the rule that applies to rares of most years?
Agreed. Typically 3-4 uncommons are equal to a rare. The trade was unfair to the '10 rare.




Zelda_the_Wolf wrote:Sorry but I learned from 2 very old players.
4 commons- 1 rare (same year)
2 Uncommons- 1 rare
2 rares- 1 very rare




YellowFang Forever wrote:YellowFang Forever wrote:YellowFang Forever wrote:
RedAutumnLeaf wrote:Zelda_the_Wolf wrote:Sorry but I learned from 2 very old players.
4 commons- 1 rare (same year)
2 Uncommons- 1 rare
2 rares- 1 very rareI will get an answer from an experienced player I know. Then we will be able to work this out.
Vindicated wrote:Is this fair for a trade down?
LuckyHeart wrote:was this fair?
Vindicated wrote:Is this fair for a trade down?




[-Death Wish-] wrote:[-Death Wish-] wrote:[-Death Wish-] wrote:Is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=45384239&userid=711642&signature=GBNtwfDtSofnecr2Zb0EPQ
Thanks in advance!




Users browsing this forum: Emmaginary, narqotic, Nicnova and 3 guests