3 month rule
Jdcreationz wrote:This 2009 Vr horse and rare dog
Horse: I believe 2-4 2009 rares
Dog: 3 month rule
Jdcreationz wrote:This 2009 Vr horse and rare dog
Current Goals wrote:
▪ own one of each store pet, incl. list ▪
▪ own one of each pet uncommon & below ▪
▪ own one of each rare pet from 2011 to present ▪
Credits wrote:All artwork use as avvie/siggy has been purchased for my exclusive use! Characters are owned by me.
Current Goals wrote:
▪ own one of each store pet, incl. list ▪
▪ own one of each pet uncommon & below ▪
▪ own one of each rare pet from 2011 to present ▪
Credits wrote:All artwork use as avvie/siggy has been purchased for my exclusive use! Characters are owned by me.
feathermoth wrote:Ok. So this is a hypothetical question. It's about the "Why don't C$ values add up like pets?" section. A Sunjewel is worth 1840 C$. Suppose you opened up a C$ shop and sold 62 '09 rares at 30 C$ each. That would be 1860 C$. Then you could buy a Sunjewel?! That doesn't seem remotely fair. People trading would have to go through waaaay more to get a Sunjewel. In pets, 62 '09 rares is like a high September. The C$ thing seems like less of a way to make sure people don't spend too much money and more of a loophole caused by problematic conversions.
So do people actually sell their mainlists for C$? Because they really wouldn't get their money's worth for them, so to speak. Sorry if this has been asked before, but it really, really bothers me.
Users browsing this forum: Aurora Storm, Potatomom and 3 guests