Closed! Go to new thread!

[galactia]

Fair? http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... fjCId1qqpA

[Quackers <3]

How does this look? Thanks in advance!!

[Horrified]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... mXG5Q9MaUw

Ty in advance

[zenzi]

[quotbe="Marie Anne"]

Or this?

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... HAZdnWeE0g

This is MASSIVE overpay for the Liontail. The UR Ice Cat is a Main List.

There's not that much demand for the liontails. Not even for a full set of them.

...That is the MOST ridiculous statement I've heard on CS in some time. That's like saying the Raven or BA doesn't have outstanding demand. The liontails are wildly popular and have the demand to reflect it.

It's not reflected on the Rares List, which take into account demand. Just not "greedy" demand. I'm sorry that you disagree with my opinion, but it's just that. My opinion. It's unfair according to the Rares List. That's what I base my trading off of and in turn, what I give my advice on. If I can trade a high advent and a few rares for a Liontail, then I wouldn't think that anyone else should pay for more than they're worth.[/quote]

i agree that by rarity its a lot of overpay and it should be at least taken into consideration
though on the other hand there is general demand, and with general demand the set is worth a sorbet ish. recently there has been in a spike in demand so the set has gone for more then a sorbet, ranging around a sorbet - non.
if the liontail set was at its standard 'general demand' value, each liontail would be valued at roughly a UR ice cat. now because there is a spike, its going for a bit more then that, therefore i would say you should wait till a better offer.
i also traded away my jeweled liontail + some extras for a sorbet alone recently as well. heres the trade

[Sinbreaker]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=57024526&userid=761267&signature=y_pcMRgWP0D2mXG5Q9MaUw

Ty in advance

Unfair to you ^^
The VR pet on their side is equal to 2 2009 rares, and the pet on your side is equal to 3-4 2009 rares.
The 2016 pets they added on your side do not cover the gap.

[Crazy swordfish]

Thanks to people who replied to the last one!♡
♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡
They added,
Is this fair now (demand and rarity-wise pls :3)?

and I just got a trade for the zebra again.

Is this fair? Demand and rarity-wise pls :3

Which one is better? And would you accept them?
♡♡

i think the first would be fair demand wise

[God's Princess]

Thanks to people who replied to the last one!♡
♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡
They added,
Is this fair now (demand and rarity-wise pls :3)?

and I just got a trade for the zebra again.

Is this fair? Demand and rarity-wise pls :3

Which one is better? And would you accept them?
♡♡

i think the first would be fair demand wise

I disagree. The first trade has one tier 1 advent and the rest are regular rares. The second trade has a joker bunny which I believe is a main list pet with more C$ than the other. That to me seems fairer, but still unfair to the Zebra.

[Civic Princess]

ahh i got another trade i need tips on

here

thanks for any help <3

[Horror]

.
.

This fair? I don't know rose dog demand.
Edit: boop, this one too.

.
.

[pillowa]

Thanks to people who replied to the last one!♡
♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡

Is this an over? If not, what do they need to add for it to be an over

Demand-wise and rarity wise pls! :3

Would you accept it? o3o

ALSO

They added,
Is this fair now (demand and rarity-wise pls :3)?

and I just got a trade for the zebra again.

Is this fair? Demand and rarity-wise pls :3

Which one is better? And would you accept them?



♡♡