Please use new thread.

[Inska]

Hi, could I get an opinion on which trade is better?
Trade 1
Trade 2
Which would you recommend accepting?
Thanks!

Well... frankly I probably would not recommend accepting either. While both are overpaying, I am more of a person who likes to stick to quantity.
the blue balloon is overpaying by 8 mid advents ( a blood PPS. ), and the UR lion is fair if you value the CEG at a non tier like I do. By list alone, the UR lion is however overpaying by very roughly a purple toxic

Thanks! Could I get a second opinion?

The first one depends on what your goal is. If you simply want more fodder or if you want to trade up it's an excellent offer as they're overpaying and offering a high-demand pet. If your goal is to have advent list fodder though you're probably better off with the septembers.
On the second I have to disagree with Vixey. I've heard the "CEG=Non" thing quite often recently but this is literally the first time I've acually seen someone offer that much for a CEG since I've started being active on the FTT again (~ 3 months). I mean, I own three and the most overpay I've offered is a Wolf PPS. If you want fodder, I'd definitely recommend accepting that one as the UR lion has quite good demand and it's unfair to them.

Heya^^ was wondering on the amount of C$ that would be suggested to add to my side to make this fair? Thank you~

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... B-blf7ewZw

The trade is unfair to them by roughly a '09 rare, so you'd have to add 30 C$ or so.

Hello! Holding my Raven UFA... Based on demand, which is best? Which would I get most out of?
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
Will gift whoever answers first. <3 (I'm still taking bids BTW!) Have a nice day; thank you!

5 and 3 look like good offers to me but 8 is nice to c:

5 Seems like a good deal, Along with 2~

I (half) agree. If you list all the bids (very roughly) with demand it looks like this:
1. ~40 mid advents, neutral demand
2. ~120 mid advents, neutral demand
3. ~20 mid advents, good demand
4. ~80 mid advents, neutral-low demand
5. ~45 mid advents, neutral demand
6. ~90 mid advents, neutral demand
8. cancelled
Considering that the demand of tribals is lower than the demand of toxics, I'd pick number two over five.

[haylin]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... qrpuihKeVQ

Would this be fair? Thanks in advance <3

[vitya]

i have a this offer on my ur tiger,what needs to be added ? thanks ^^
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... x20sJpI-cg
And this offer
Sunjewel + sunback for my ur tiger. Which one is better ?


Also on a totally different note I got this : they want these pets for there 10c$ is that fair ?:)

I am on the other side of the snuck/sunjewel trade, so I would also like to know. C;

[_Cat~Eye_]

I'm really tempted to accept this offer on my ur tiger but I would really like some opinions on it first ^^
All these pets ( 20 list pets ) + 153 items ( mostly wigs, stuff from the store and older items )

[ThunderCedar]

On the second I have to disagree with Vixey. I've heard the "CEG=Non" thing quite often recently but this is literally the first time I've acually seen someone offer that much for a CEG since I've started being active on the FTT again (~ 3 months). I mean, I own three and the most overpay I've offered is a Wolf PPS. If you want fodder, I'd definitely recommend accepting that one as the UR lion has quite good demand and it's unfair to them.

I said I personally value it at a non though, not that it's worth a non. ;v;' Because that's what I see it go for in auction.
Proof, from recent auctions (within the past 2 months, I'm positive I didn't go further than that in the search option) X X X
The two cancelled ones that I posted were topped by another better bid, unfortunately I do not know what it is because no one ever posts the winning bid in auctions c:
edit: yay, found more ^.^ x

[pillow.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=52052478&userid=512049&signature=i1XgxzcxpnTDjDO8OzooaA

How's this? What's a grinner demand lately and is it fully fair to me and the other person?

[rosycetus]

x
x
Help, is this fair?
I'm not sure because they want my pet, which is a 2014 rare, but they're giving rares also...

UPDATE: I received another offer with the
same 2014 rare and another pet, but this
time they're offering me more rares,
what do you think about this one?

[.Ranger.]

I have returned with a question! A question I have returned with! Okay then... Fair or Unfair? Personally, I believe unfair since malks are difficult to get and mine is a re-release from 2009, but I could be wrong.

[FenFen]

I have returned with a question! A question I have returned with! Okay then... Fair or Unfair? Personally, I believe unfair since malks are difficult to get and mine is a re-release from 2009, but I could be wrong.

unfair your pet is worth at least twoo 2010 rares but is also populare and has good demand

[Eevee]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... MmQakeb2NQ

Is this fair? I dont think its fair to add 2 store pets? But im not entirely sure. Thanks for any help!