I am so confused about why you guys are all talking about litters.
Littermates do not in any way affect the rarity of their siblings after the month is over.
Deleting the littermate of a dog will not increase its rarity at all.
Saying you have 1000 pets sounds like a good start until you say "litter". Divide that by the amount of outcomes in that litter and suddenly you have a couple of hundred, which is frankly nothing. If you want to see a rarity change, come back when you have 10,000 of a single pet. Otherwise there is no reason to delete pets, that's like removing water out of a lake with a spoon in the hopes that the lake will look smaller. Unless it's already on the cusp of looking smaller, it's not going to.
JessannaHope wrote:But what if people don't realise you are keeping the said amount? The demand won't go up until they realise it, because the pet is still uncommon. they might notice "Hey, I can't find this uncommon outcome anymore." but nothing more.
I think you have to actually delete them to make the difference we want to see. Like the REP. A lot of people see the demand go up. But I've only seen it been raised a small bit, not really even worth mentioning. To me, its just a "Wow nobody has those whitebacks. The REP is working."
Anyone who is actually deleting them, if I have a double of your target you can have it for free.
I'm afraid your comment is incorrect, because it is based on the assumption that the REP deleted the pets, and they didn't. They just hoarded them. The pet in question did not go up in rarity because of the REP. Hoards do not affect rarity, only trade supply.