Adding urgent won't get you responses any quicker.
1. Unfair to them, 2016 rare = 2014 uncommon, though whether you want to trade a rare for an uncommon is up to you
2. Also unfair to them. 2016 store pet = (early) 2010 rare or 4 2010 uncommons. They're overpaying with a 2013 uncommon and the 2015+ pets
3. Wrong link
1. Unfair to them, 2016 rare = 2014 uncommon, though whether you want to trade a rare for an uncommon is up to you
2. Also unfair to them. 2016 store pet = (early) 2010 rare or 4 2010 uncommons. They're overpaying with a 2013 uncommon and the 2015+ pets
3. Wrong link
Metatarsals wrote:Is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=70861172&userid=887821&signature=VIXR8Uab0-8LIIH4d7nmIg
Unfair to them, a non is worth 3 sorbets, your side is hardly worth even 1 sorbet
Ṇadine wrote:
Their bun is an advent list worth 3-4 09 rares, your side isn't worth one so it's very unfair to them