Trade Rant Thread. {new rule please look}

[Lady]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=12354492&userid=58&signature=oQXGRgEYyvWbT4kt90l1Rw
Message was "I sent you a wishlist pet "
My message back was "good for you"
I got a PM back "Why didn't you accept my trade?"
I feel the need to punch myself in the face.

Why didn't you accept?!!! It's a WL pet! You're obligated to give them back stuff because they were awesome enough to give you a WL PET! Gift them nao! /sarcasm

Why do people really think this type of thing has even the remotest chance of working?

Lol, no clue. But I've gotten worse:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... y0BVhHWFyw - 5uc & 2c 2011's = 2vr 2008's
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 8g_3n1fvxA - 3uc from Oct 2011 = 1vr 2008


Did have one that looked legit, but they had stuck one of my rare early 2009's in there with all kinds of others from this year that matched up. Sneaky ppl.

[sylvre]

If I send you a trade, it's ultimately my fault if it's unfair to me.
I don't need a lecture on rarities because I decided to overpay for one of your pets.
Thank you, and have a great day. BI

[JadeRQ]

HI Mr/Miss/Mrs. '09 player!

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... W_6hMBbhJA

-.-

[tazzazi]

I hate it when people offer two of exactly the same pets and you already have them
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Kbbr6eonVQ
*cancels*once mabye.....
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Yjy1t2g-VA
same person

[Dawni]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=12354492&userid=58&signature=oQXGRgEYyvWbT4kt90l1Rw
Message was "I sent you a wishlist pet "
My message back was "good for you"
I got a PM back "Why didn't you accept my trade?"
I feel the need to punch myself in the face.

... People must think just 'cause something's on someone's WL it boosts it's rarity.

I just got this. Their message?

is this ok?? the only reason this is a suggestion is because of the age difference yours is a 2009 and mine is this month but it was on your wishlist. so let me know.

*headdesk*

[Takora Drakan]

... People must think just 'cause something's on someone's WL it boosts it's rarity.

Sometimes it does, but within reason. I am personally willing to overpay a bit for WL pets, and most people do also, but the people that offer them think they can pull the string further as bearable and thus pull out some extra rares in the process. And that is the point where people snap because they feel they are trying to rip them off. :Y

[♥ ♥ ♥]

... People must think just 'cause something's on someone's WL it boosts it's rarity.

Sometimes it does, but within reason. I am personally willing to overpay a bit for WL pets, and most people do also, but the people that offer them think they can pull the string further as bearable and thus pull out some extra rares in the process. And that is the point where people snap because they feel they are trying to rip them off. :Y

I don't over/underpay for wishlists. I mean - that are the pet's I want. If you're offering something whats not on my wishlist, I don't want it. c:

[Imzadi83]

Rant: when you're flipping through someone's groups or pets, and they say "nft or die." So, you're saying if I ask for this pet, or a pet in this group, you will come all the way to my house, and kill me? Or you will virtually kill me because I asked for a pixel pet?

I understand people want to keep certain pets, or certain groups of pets, but a simple "nft or I'll foe you" would work, not "threatening" people.

(I'm sorry, it's just this annoys me to no end).

Threatening people is against CS rules and can, and should be, reported.

[MadMadamMim]

People who cancel perfectly fair, if not overpaying trades, because they 'don't support hoards'.. I'm sorry, but you have 20 of them just sitting in your trade group so they obviously don't mean that much to you, and if I'm overpaying then why does it matter that they're going into a hoard? o.O I just don't get it XD

[BassNectar]

Rant: when you're flipping through someone's groups or pets, and they say "nft or die." So, you're saying if I ask for this pet, or a pet in this group, you will come all the way to my house, and kill me? Or you will virtually kill me because I asked for a pixel pet?

I understand people want to keep certain pets, or certain groups of pets, but a simple "nft or I'll foe you" would work, not "threatening" people.

(I'm sorry, it's just this annoys me to no end).

Threatening people is against CS rules and can, and should be, reported.

I agree with you. I think that bothers me even more than codewords :c
I didn't know you could report it though