Tess wrote:I think you CS geneticists are putting way more thought into this than we ever do xD
LOL, I think it was all in fun, at least my part was. xD But oh the fun!
whiteouthorizon wrote:Wha...? Someone mind giving me a brief summary of the whole "genetics" conversation? (In English, please. xD)
In short (if I can do short, lol) we were discussing the possibility of traits being passed on. (Traits being things that are inherited, or passed down, to the children in this case.) It's already been shown that some of the pups look a touch like their grandparents. So, they did pass down some traits since they have things the parent's didn't, but the grandparents did.
Traits are basically either Dominant or Recessive. For dominant traits, they are there, period. For recessive traits, it can only happen if the parent's both have recessive traits, and only then every so often.
So, we were discussing whether or not there -might- be a PPS in the litter. lol...this is getting long, sorry! But...we looked at the grandparents to see if they had any PPS 'genes' or 'traits' in their litters and siblings. None of the ones with siblings did. But, several of the grandparents had no siblings, but came out in the advent calendar in '08.
The two litters with PPS pups in them were also '08 advents with no siblings. So we discussed the possibility of them being related, meaning they all carried the same PPS trait, or possibility.
Umm...does any of that make sense? X3