Help please!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=55649476&userid=635636&signature=khFA7BSScneZ_URpBQ28lA
The Mrs. Mad Hatter wrote:Is this fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... N6Kb8_Os5w
Shep. wrote:~ t r o u b l e ~ wrote:smolldeer wrote:[Since the first trade is mine, I'll answer the second.
It's unfair to them. The uncommon lion is completely unnecessary.1. Unfair to the apple by rarity, their side is worth a rose pps
The apple has low demand
2. Without the lion is unfair to you. Their rare is worth a mid-late 09 rare, not an early 09 rare
I would say it looks okay as is, if anything unfair to you✗ Id say for the second one unfair - however without the lion fair
The '09 on their side was originally released in 2008 but available for a long period of time - http://www.chickensmoothie.com/archive/2008/August/Dog~ Shep ;;
dragonmaster427 wrote:Thanks guys. I would like more opinions on this trade though :D
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... WpGk5QtgnA
Lady_Lycana wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=55649312&userid=645166&signature=M6lYdg-B1UXPCY1kBw7WYQ
Is this a good bid for my true date rainbow draft
Blenore wrote:=
Is this fair?
Foxy The Pirate Fox wrote:Blenore wrote:=
Is this fair?
If someone is trading you the set, overpay.
If you are trading the set, overpay.
It would be like trading 4 2009 rares for a 2010 uncommon. Although warrior cats do tend for demand,
but i think the whole set of a 2012 or 2011 store pets would quite be a bit much
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot [Bot], apirl, Scarlet Janefox, ᴍᴀᴏᴄɪғᴇʀ and 11 guests