~ A Store Pet Guide ~ [updated 05-01-2022]

[Semper Fi]

marking

[nickjr]

I'm not entirely sure, but i think there's a mistake on the front page.
As far as i know, the raven was the one which was rare at some time and not the patchwork. The raven was bought more often due to it's popular design...
Or am i misinformed here?

Huh. That's weird. I've been working under the same impression as you. The rarity changes archive says the Raven was rare for a year after its release

[DaDwarf]

I'm not entirely sure, but i think there's a mistake on the front page.
As far as i know, the raven was the one which was rare at some time and not the patchwork. The raven was bought more often due to it's popular design...
Or am i misinformed here?

Huh. That's weird. I've been working under the same impression as you. The rarity changes archive says the Raven was rare for a year after its release

That was a typo :) good catch! it was supposed to say 'the raven was never very rare due to its popularity'. I've edited it now!

[Eaglespirit]

Were the winged dogs really 30? I had someone contradict it on the FTT and Im not sure about it
As an extension of that question, does that change their value at all?

[acatalepsy]

Were the winged dogs really 30? I had someone contradict it on the FTT and Im not sure about it
As an extension of that question, does that change their value at all?

viewtopic.php?p=102444409#p102444409 seems like they were each 20 C$ and were 70 C$ total

[FreddyCenobite]

Were the winged dogs really 30? I had someone contradict it on the FTT and Im not sure about it
As an extension of that question, does that change their value at all?

I have been on for 6 years; not once has a store pet ever been more than 20C$ individually. Sets, however, range all the time.

I think what the meant is now, not then. As store pets get older they do not remain 20C$ in value, it goes up, but very slowly.

[Eaglespirit]

Were the winged dogs really 30? I had someone contradict it on the FTT and Im not sure about it
As an extension of that question, does that change their value at all?

I have been on for 6 years; not once has a store pet ever been more than 20C$ individually. Sets, however, range all the time.

I think what the meant is now, not then. As store pets get older they do not remain 20C$ in value, it goes up, but very slowly.

The rest are listed as what the price was then, I imagine it was a typo
But being fairly new still I wasn't sure, since they were released waaaay before I came on

[FreddyCenobite]

Were the winged dogs really 30? I had someone contradict it on the FTT and Im not sure about it
As an extension of that question, does that change their value at all?

I have been on for 6 years; not once has a store pet ever been more than 20C$ individually. Sets, however, range all the time.

I think what the meant is now, not then. As store pets get older they do not remain 20C$ in value, it goes up, but very slowly.

The rest are listed as what the price was then, I imagine it was a typo
But being fairly new still I wasn't sure, since they were released waaaay before I came on

It mostly depends on their dates, but previous years (in this case 2016)... I'm assuming they did a typo without realizing, or they're uneducated. Most likely typo. Either way I'm sure others corrected them by now since ftt usually gets corrections almost instantly.

[DaDwarf]

Was a typo, its a large guide so they happen xD the dogs were inded 20 each and 70 as a set. All pets have been 20 since the early days. Theres a small disclaimer up top saying that but yes, the winged dogs was a typo. Was there for almost a year, i never noticed looool


If anyone wants to go through and check for more typos then please do because two in a row has never happened before o: i generally catch em when proof reading lool

[DaDwarf]

updated!