Slightly unfair to you if you follow the 3 month rule. Your pets are both older by around 9 months, I would potentially add a '10R onto their side
Trade 1 (their pets, your tokens): completely depends how you value tokens. If you value at C$2 each (generally accepted token value for this event), this is unfair to you by 2x 2020C/2x2021 UC. However, with the end of the event very near, most people have already gotten the majority of pets that they want for the event, so token demand is getting lower. I personally would take this trade if I had all the event pets that I wanted.
Trade 2 (their pets for your event pet): hard to tell for sure without rarities. I would safely say reasonably fair if not favouring your side - particularly if that pet ends up being an UC
Trade 3 (all event pets): hard to tell, the horses cancel each other out as it is same litter (at least while rarity is unknown) and same with the raptor + pps pup (free pet for free pet). As for the crystal dig pets, I've seen a bit of variation in the value of this between 1 crystal + 3 crystals per dig pet. if you value 1:1 dig pet and crystals then it would be fair, if not, they may need to add another crystal token pet to their side
EditPink wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95233603&userid=902320&signature=lKwZwDIHTDsDetzfDZuytg
not really interested in this but is it fair
The 2012 store B-wolf is valued at around 1MA (8x09R), the two dogs that they are trading are both Low Octobers valued at just under 0.5 MA ea (3x 09R), which brings their total to a little under 1MA (6x09R) which favours your side by about 2x 09R. I'm not 100% sure about the demand for these pups though, so might be worth getting a second opinion (source
x).
Summary: Not completely unfair, favours your side (2xdogs)